What Steps Can Solve the Frictional Force in a Banked Curve Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a car navigating a banked curve, where the frictional force needs to be determined. The user has correctly set up free body diagrams and equations for the net forces in both the x and y directions but is struggling with the calculations. Suggestions include resolving the frictional force into its components and ensuring the correct application of trigonometric functions. The final calculations yield a normal force of 13972.5 N and a frictional force of 2257.5 N acting down the incline, which is consistent with the conditions of the problem. The derived coefficient of friction is 0.161, indicating a feasible solution.
HeatherH
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've been working on this problem for hours and I just can't figure out what to do next! Here it is-

A car drives around a curve with radius 410 m at a speed of 32 m/s. The road is banked at 5.0 degrees. The mass of the car is 1400 kg. What is the frictional force on the car?

I drew the FBD and got net force equations for the x and y directions:

Fxnet: Fsin(theta) = m(vsquared)/r -Nsin(theta)
Fynet: Fcos(theta) = Ncos(theta) - mg

But now I don't know what to do. I know what the correct answer is (back of the book), but I can't figure out how to get there. When I plug in the numbers, it doesn't come out right. Are my net force equations wrong?

Hints? Suggestions? Please!

Thanks, Heather
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the frictional force f? Resolve it into horizontal and vertical components and add it to your equations of motion.
 
The frictional force is the Fsin(theta) for the x/horizontal and Fcos(theta) for the y/vertical. I think I did that part right, but I'm really not that great at physics, so it could be wrong.
 
ok I am defining x to be radially inwards/outwars and the y direction to be up and down. These directions are as I stated them and not oriented along the incline. It seems in your equations you had the wrong trig function associated with the friction and some of your directions were opposite.

From the FBD in the Y direction we have
Normal*cos(theta) + Friction*sin(theta) - Weight = 0

From the FBD in the X direction we have
Normal*sin(theta) - Friction*cos(theta) = m*v^2/r

2eqns, 2 unknowns (Normal and Friction), the system is linear too!

Sorry I really don't feel like solving this algebraiclly so I am just going to throw in the numbers

This gives

Normal = 13972.5 N (perpendicularily outwards of the incline)
Friction = -2257.5 N (up the incline)

Notice in the model I chose I had friction acting up the incline, because this value is negative, we know the actual frictional force is

Friction = 2257.5 N (down the incline)

This is feasible as Friction < Normal
These values give u = 0.161 which is a reasonable value for the coefficient of friction
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top