How Should the Radius Change for Higher Speeds on Banked Circular Ramps?

AI Thread Summary
To design a banked circular ramp for a car moving at 26 m/s, the radius must increase by a factor of 4 compared to a ramp designed for 13 m/s. The relevant equations for circular motion indicate that centripetal acceleration is proportional to the square of the speed and inversely proportional to the radius. As speed doubles, the required centripetal force increases, necessitating a larger radius to maintain balance between gravitational and inertial forces. The banking angle remains constant, allowing for the relationship between speed and radius to be expressed as tan(θ) = v²/(rg). Therefore, the correct modification for the radius is to quadruple it.
watsup91749
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
hello, I am new and I am really just starting out in physics, but i have a question that my textbook doesn't address yet gives some problems on. This is a sample problem, it deals with banking during circular motion. "Circular freeway entrace and exit ramps are commonly banked to handle a car moving at 13 m/s. To design a similar ramp for 26 m/s, one should:
A) increase radius by a factor of 2
B) decrease radius by a factor of 2
C) increase radius by a factor of 4
D) decrease radius by a factor of 4
E) increase radius by a factor of squareroot of 2

the only circular motion equations i have are a= v^2/R and F=m V2/R
Does anyone know any equations that i can use to solve this? i have other problems like this but give angles of banking, and so does anyone know other equations i can use to figure these problems out?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you know that the net force along the incline is:

F = \frac{mv^2}{r} \cos (\theta) - mg \sin (\theta)

This is of course in the frictionless case. Can you rewrite the expression when considering friction? After you do that, it should be obvious how to modify a bank so as to allow the new speed.
 
You don't really need to do the explicit calculations to answer this. This problem is asking you to look at how key quantities vary with respect to one another so that you can say how one changes if the other does.

You're looking at a curve and a car with doubled speed. Well, you've given the expression for the centripetal acceleration required for the car to follow the curved ramp, so how will this force change if the speed is doubled? Okay, now you know how this force has changed - has the gravitational force changed (hint: it's due only to the mass of the car)? Recall that the banking is done in order to balance the pull of gravity down the slope with the inertial (centrifugal) force up the slope. To keep them balanced if the speed is doubled, what do you need to do to the radius? (Look at the equations you stated - they're all you need.)
 
i think this is how it should be :
the eq for banking is : tan (\theta)= \frac{v^2}{rg}

where r is the radius and g is acc due to gravity . tan theta remains constant leaving u with this
\frac{13^2}{r} = \frac{26^2}{r'}

now r' =4r
this should be the answer.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top