Barton's Pendulums - Energy Conservation

AI Thread Summary
In a Barton's pendulum system with two pendulums of equal natural frequency, oscillation of one pendulum causes the other to oscillate due to resonance, assuming an ideal system without friction. When the first pendulum is released at amplitude A, energy is transferred back and forth between the two pendulums, leading to a decrease in the amplitude of the first pendulum while the second begins to oscillate. The total energy remains conserved, but the individual amplitudes do not stay constant; they fluctuate as energy is exchanged. An example is provided where a grandfather clock's pendulum and a hanging weight coupled due to their similar lengths, illustrating the principle of resonance in action. Ultimately, the system demonstrates that while energy is conserved, individual amplitudes can vary.
wavingerwin
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have two pendulums of equal natural frequency set up like a Barton's pendulums system (hung on a common string).

If we oscillate one of the pendulums, the other will also oscillate due to resonance.

Supposing it's an ideal system where there is no friction.

If we release the first pendulum at amplitude=A, as the second pendulum starts to oscillate will the amplitude decreases? (this is my guess, since the total energy of the first pendulum will be transferred overtime to make the second one oscillate).

Or will it stay the same, and ultimately both of the pendulum swings at amplitude=A?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is transferred back and forth between the two pendulums while the total energy is conserved. Thus the amplitude A is not conserved. A friend of mine built a full size Grandfarher clock, with a long pendulum and a hanging weights on a chain to provide power to the mechanism. He asked me to come over to his house and look at it, because sometimes the hanging weight would sometimes start to swing in unison with the pendulum when their lengths were about the same. The problem was that the clock was sitting on a high pile carpet, that allowed the two hanging weights to couple.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top