Basic Calculus: Differentiation usage

EEristavi
Messages
108
Reaction score
5
Problem:
How fast is the area of a rectangle changing if one side is I0 cm
long and is increasing at a rate of 2 cm/s and the other side is 8 cm
long and is decreasing at a rate of 3 cm/s?I have 2 approach and I want to know which is correct, why and what am I missing
 

Attachments

  • calc.jpg
    calc.jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 378
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello EE, :welcome:

Why do you use t=2 in the second approach ? Why not 1, 1/2, 1/10 or 1/1000 ? What is the limit for ##t\downarrow 0## ?

Oh, and read the PF rules -- they in fact don't allow me to answer your post as is...
 
EEristavi said:
Problem:
How fast is the area of a rectangle changing if one side is I0 cm
long and is increasing at a rate of 2 cm/s and the other side is 8 cm
long and is decreasing at a rate of 3 cm/s?I have 2 approach and I want to know which is correct, why and what am I missing

You should type out your solution; most helpers will not look at images of handwritten work. Read the thread "Guidelines for students and helpers", by Vela, for more on this issue.
 
Ray, I thought micromass posted the guidelines (link in post #2 -- and I see EE was indeed reading them :smile: Good!)

EE: In fact you worked out s alright in approach 2. ##80 - 14 t - 6 t^2##. The derivative is correct too: ## {dS\over dt} = 14 - 12 t ## and my
BvU said:
Why do you use t=2 in the second approach ?
was mistaken.
the rate of growth at ##t=0## comes out the same: ##-14## (but you forgot the minus sign in 1).

The rate of growth for other ##t## comes out the same too if you fill in the correct ##b## and ##a## !


And I agree with Ray about typing instead of posting a picture. But I ve seen a lot of pictures a lot worse than yours -- and this Is your first thread.
 
BvU said:
But I ve seen a lot of pictures a lot worse than yours
I've seen a lot that were better, too. The image posted here is very small and not well lit, making it harder to read.
 
Thank you everyone for helping me and giving tips :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top