Basic Doubts on BAR MAGNETISM & Magnetic Reversals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr.Brain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on basic concepts of bar magnetism, specifically addressing the angle of dip at the poles, the effects of magnetic reversals, and the properties of magnetic dipole moments. The angle of dip is explained as being 90 degrees at the poles because the magnetic field lines are vertical, despite the misconception that it should be 0 degrees. Concerns about the impact of magnetic reversals on Earth's magnetic field direction are raised, although specific adverse effects are not detailed. Questions regarding the pole strength of bar magnets of varying lengths and the possibility of replacing solenoids with bar magnets of equivalent magnetic dipole moments are also discussed, with clarification on the relationship between geometry and magnetic properties. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding magnetic dipole moments and the historical context of pole theory in education.
Dr.Brain
Messages
537
Reaction score
2
OK ..actually i don't have any doubts generally but when I do some new chapters, i do have some.

I was reading about BAR MAGNETISM and about para,dia and ferro properties of materials. My first doubt:

1)How can "angle of dip" at the poles be 90 degrees? .. I think at the South Or North Pole , the bar magnet becomes verticle such that N always points in the direction of the net field.So It should make and angle of 0 degrees at the poles!

2) What are the adverse effects of the Magnetic reversals that take place as for the Earth's magnetic field dirction?

3)Suppose we have a bar magnet Of material A with pole strength "m" ... now we make another Bar magnet from same material A with length more than the previous one .. does its "m" change?

4) I think we can replace each coil of a solenoid by a bar magnet of pole strength "m" such that md=iA ..right? ... can we do something like replace the solenoid with only one bar magnet with same "m" as the previous method but length equal to that of solenoid's?

These are my own doubts.Thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question 4 makes sense but you should know that the pole theory has long been abandoned and in India, it is taught only for historical reasons. Some of the books you may consult are older volumes of Resnick and Halliday (part II), Sears/Zemansky and perhaps your textbook as well.

For question 4, you already have half the answer in the question. The magnetic dipole moment is an assigned quantity and so equality of it for two distinct geometries merely implies (if the currents are unequal) the product of the three quantitites that make it up is equal. Further, if two bodies with the same magnetic dipole moment are kept in the same external field, they will experience the same (magntitude) of torque.

Cheers
Vivek
 
Dr. Brain said:
1)How can "angle of dip" at the poles be 90 degrees? .. I think at the South Or North Pole , the bar magnet becomes verticle such that N always points in the direction of the net field.So It should make and angle of 0 degrees at the poles!

How is "angle of dip" measured?? In other words relative to what? Oh, and I think you should specify north and south magnetic poles.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top