Basic Energy and Time Uncertainty Problem

ElijahRockers
Gold Member
Messages
260
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement



A pi zero meson is an unstable particle produced in high energy particle collisions. It has a mass-energy equivalent of about 135MeV, and it exists for an average life-time of only 8.7x10^-17 seconds before decaying into two gamma rays. Using the uncertainty principle, estimate the fractional uncertainty Δm/m in its mass determination.

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok,

I know mc^2 = 135 MeV = 2.16x10^-11 J
Δt = 8.7x10-17 s

And I suspect I am supposed to use ΔtΔE ≥ h/(4pi)

Taking a wild stab in the dark here based off of some examples I've looked at:

ΔE/E = Δm/m ?

if so, I am given E, and the time-energy uncertainty equation will give me ΔE, so I can calculate Δm/m

only I'm getting the wrong answer.

This question is addressed in a previous thread, located here, where Javier suggests using ΔEΔt = h/2pi instead of h/4pi

When I use this method to calculate ΔE, then use ΔE/E = Δm/m, I get the correct answer.

Why do I have to use h/2pi instead of h/4pi?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I understand it, the usual formulation of the uncertainty inequality is ΔfΔg ≥ ℏ/2. Since ℏ = h/2π, that's h/4π.
 
Yeah. but if you check the thread I linked to, someone says in this instance he should use ℏ instead of ℏ/2. i used it, and it gave me the correct answer. I'm just not sure why
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top