Basic epsilon and delta proofs, limits, quick questions.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
I am trying to check whether lim h→0 (R(h)/||h||) =0 or not.
I am working in ℝ2.
h=h1e1+h2e2**
=> ||h||=(h1^2+h2^2)^1/2

I am using the definition that (R(h)/||h||)<ε * whenever 0<|h|<δ for all h.

Example 1
(R(h)/||h||)=h1h2/(h1^2+h2^2)^3/2
I can see that the denominator dominates, so expect the limit not to exist, so in order to proove this explicitly/epsilon-delta method I look for a counter example.

I consider h1=h2. In which case I get:
(R(h)/||h||) = 1/[2^(3/2).||h||].

My problem... My book then says 'no matter how small δ is, there are therefore points with (R(h)/||h||)>ε, for every ε.'

I am don't understand this, first of all , because the expression involves 1/||h||, I thought we would be looking to increase δ to attain *<ε.
Secondly, why can't you simply take δ=1/[ε.2^(3/2)]?

Question 2
On concepts of the definition, I am confused as to whether δ can be a function of h1 and h2,as defined by **, as well as ε. I know that the definition must hold for all h, so intuitively no, but aren't h1 and h2 completely arbitary?

Many thanks for anyone who can shed some light on this, greatly appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
binbagsss said:
I am don't understand this, first of all , because the expression involves 1/||h||, I thought we would be looking to increase δ to attain *<ε.
Secondly, why can't you simply take δ=1/[ε.2^(3/2)]?
As ##h## approaches zero, ##\|h\|## also approaches zero, so ##1/\|h\|## becomes arbitrarily large: it certainly does not approach zero.

To state this more explicitly, choose any ##\epsilon > 0##. Now ##1/\|h\| > \epsilon## whenever ##\|h\| < 1/\epsilon##. This is exactly the opposite of what would happen if the limit was zero!

Question 2
On concepts of the definition, I am confused as to whether δ can be a function of h1 and h2,as defined by **, as well as ε. I know that the definition must hold for all h, so intuitively no, but aren't h1 and h2 completely arbitary?
No, the ##\delta## can depend on ##\epsilon## but not on ##h_1## and ##h_2##. Given ##\epsilon##, you need to find a ##\delta## such that ##|R(h)/\|h\|| < \epsilon## for all ##h_1## and ##h_2## that satisfy ##0 < \sqrt{h_1^2 + h_2^2} < \delta##.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top