How Do You Represent Error in a Log-Log Magnetic Field vs. Distance Graph?

AI Thread Summary
To represent error in a log-log graph of Magnetic Field versus Distance, plot a range that includes the error, such as from ln(mT-0.01) to ln(mT+0.01). For the axes, use ln(metres) for lnDistance and ln(Tesla) for lnField to maintain consistency with logarithmic representation. This approach ensures clarity in the representation of both the data and its associated errors. Proper unit notation is crucial for accurate interpretation of the graph. Clear labeling enhances the overall understanding of the plotted data.
dfx
Messages
59
Reaction score
1
Hi,
I'm investigating the variation of Magnetic Field with Distance. The investigation requires me to plot lnField against lnDistance. My question is, say the quantities had an error of +/- 0.01 mT for the Magnetic Field. How would I represent this on the ln Field v/s ln Distance graph? I intuitively thought it would be ln0.01 but that was obviously wrong as it gave a value of -4.6 ... . Any suggestions?

Also, when sketching lnDistance on the axis, should I make the units on the axis ln(metres) or just metres? And likewise with magnetic field should it be lnTesla or just Tesla? I ask this because when plotting say a quantity against (time) squared, we use the units of (s^2).

Any help very much appreciated. Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the error in the magnetic field, you would need to plot a range on the graph that includes the error. For example, if the magnetic field value is mT, then the range for the graph would be from ln(mT-0.01) to ln(mT+0.01). When plotting lnDistance on the axis, you should use ln(metres). Likewise, when plotting magnetic field you should use lnTesla. This is because when plotting a quantity against (time) squared, the units are (s^2).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top