Is There a Y-Component of Velocity in Fully Developed Pipe Flow?

AI Thread Summary
In fully developed, steady, incompressible flow within a horizontal pipe, the velocity profile is parabolic, indicating a primary x-component (u) of velocity. The discussion centers on whether a y-component (v) exists, with initial intuition suggesting it does not. However, the continuity equation indicates that if u is constant (as in fully developed flow), then v must also be zero, meaning there is no y-component of velocity. The flow is laminar, and particles move horizontally without a y-component, despite the need for v to satisfy the continuity equation. Ultimately, the understanding is that while viscosity creates velocity gradients, the flow remains predominantly horizontal.
billybob70
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Let's say we have a horizontal pipe with steady, incompressible, two dimensional flow. There is friction at the top and bottom of the pipe which causes viscous effects.
The flow is fully developed. The velocity profile is parabolic.

Obviously there is an x-component (u) of velocity.

Is there also a y-component of velocity (v), in this fully developed region?

My intuition says no, but from reading my book it implies that there is, although it is not very well explained.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If there was a 'y' component, where would it go?

EDIT: To expand on that...

Draw a control volume inside the pipe. You have no velocity crossing the boundary on either the top or the bottom. If you have any sort of 'y' velocity inside the volume, it will cause a curl in the flow field, and you've already stated that the flow is fully developed.

Which book are you using, and how does it imply that there is?
 
Last edited:
Apart of the integral explanation of enigma...

Take continuity equation:

\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}=0

If the flow is fully developed: \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}=0

Therefore \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}=0

and integrating it from 0 to y:

v(y)=v(0). Taking into account there is no suction-inflow through walls v(y)=v(0)=0

As an advice, try to work out a steady solution when there is flow suction through walls v(0) \neq 0 and see what happens. It is very easy.
 
thanks for your replies.

i understand the part of the continuity equation that says
change in u / change in x =0 when fully developed. This makes sense because the velocity is now constant.
And i understand why u is slowing down initially (because of friction).
So according to the continuity equation, if u is slowing down, v has to be speeding up. and since v initially reaches zero, it must be a negative number to start with. correct?

the part i don't understand is that its supposed to be LAMINAR flow. so if i took any particle in the stream and followed it through the pipe, it would always be running horizontally (and not have any v component).
So i understand why there is a v-component to satisfy the continuity equation, but not if i try to picture what is going on in the pipe.
 
The continuity equation is actually

What is going on in the pipe is that the wall slows the fluid down and the fluid near the center needs to speed up to "make up" for the tardines of the fluid near the wall. Note that viscosity and a velocity gradients also generates vorticity. however the assumtion is that the fuid elements translate horizontally while rotating, just like a bunch of ball bearings on top of each other
 
Thanks guys (or gals), i understand it now.
 
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Back
Top