Basic Motion Problem (Dropping Objects)

  • Thread starter Thread starter doug1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves attaching five rocks to a rope so that their impacts on the ground are evenly spaced in time when the rope is released. The top rock will have a greater final velocity than the bottom rock due to gravitational acceleration. Calculations show that the second rock should be placed 0.44 meters above the bottom rock, while the third rock should be 1.23 meters above the bottom rock, assuming a 0.2-second interval between sounds. However, the total distances must equal the length of the rope, necessitating a different approach to calculate the spacing based on time intervals. The solution requires expressing the distances in terms of the time intervals to ensure they sum correctly.
doug1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You are given a length of rope, tape and five rocks. The rocks must be attached in such a manner that when the rope is released, the sound of each rock hitting the ground is evenly spaced.

There must be a rock at the very bottom and the very top of the rope. When the rope is released, the bottom rock will be just above the ground. A stopwatch cannot be used (time cannot be recorded).

Homework Equations



Any of the following kinematics equations:

d=1/2(Vf+Vi)t
Vf=Vi+at
d=Vit+1/2at^2
d=Vft-1/2at^2
Vf^2=Vi^2+2ad

The Attempt at a Solution



a.) I understand that the rope will accelerate downwards due to gravity. This means that the rock at the top of the rope will have a faster final velocity just before impact than the rock at the bottom of the rope.
b.) Assuming that the bottom rock takes 0.1s to hit the ground I made the following calculations:

(Trying to space the sounds 0.2 second apart):

2nd rock from the bottom:

d = Vit+1/2at^2
d = (0)t + 1/2(9.81m/s^2)(0.3s)^2
d = 0.44 m

This means the second rock will be placed 0.44 m from the first rock (0.44 m from the bottom of the rope).

3rd rock from the bottom:

d = Vit+1/2at^2
d = (0)t + 1/2(9.81m/s^2)(0.5s)^2
d = 1.23 m

This means that the third rock will be placed 1.23 m from the bottom of the rope.


Is this the correct approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Close but you are given the length of rope so the distances have to add up to that length. Hard to do it that way.

Perhaps write equations for dtop and dbot in terms of Δt. where Δt = one time interval.

The length of the rope is then dtop - dbot. Rearrange to give Δt ?

Something like that.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top