Basic Probability question for a spin 1/2 Particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probabilities of measuring spin components Sz and Sx for a spin-1/2 particle in a given state. For part b, the probabilities can be derived directly from the formula provided, using the orthogonality of the spin states. However, part a presents challenges in determining the necessary inner products for Sz measurements, as the user is unsure how to relate the spin states in the z-basis to those in the x-basis. Additionally, there is a note that the wavefunction may not be properly normalized, which is crucial for accurate probability calculations. Understanding the relationship between different spin bases is essential for solving these types of quantum mechanics problems.
richyw
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A beam of spin-1/2 particles is prepared in the state

\left|\psi\right\rangle=\frac{2}{\sqrt{13}}\left|+\right\rangle_x+i \frac{2}{\sqrt{13}}\left|-\right\rangle_x

a) What are the possible results of a measurement of the spin component Sz, and with what probabilities would they occur?

b) What are the possible results of a measurement of the spin component Sx, and with what probabilities would they occur?

Homework Equations



P_x=\left|\left\langle x\right| \left. \psi \right\rangle\right|^2

The Attempt at a Solution



So I can find out the answer to part b just by plugging it straight into the formula and using that _x\left\langle +\right| \left. + \right\rangle_x=1 and _x\left\langle +\right| \left. - \right\rangle_x=0

my problem is with the first part of the question. If I use the same method as before I end up with
_z\left\langle +\right| \left. + \right\rangle_x\\<br /> _z\left\langle +\right| \left. - \right\rangle_x\\<br /> _z\left\langle -\right| \left. + \right\rangle_x\\<br /> _z\left\langle -\right| \left. - \right\rangle_x in my equations. And I do not understand how to know what these are.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can express ##_z\left\langle +\right |## in terms of ##_x\left\langle +\right |## and ##_x\left\langle -\right |## (or vice versa).

Your wavefunction does not look properly normalized.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top