Basic question on recrystallization.

  • Thread starter Thread starter scorpion990
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A solid initially melts at 150-160 degrees Celsius, but after recrystallization, the melting point drops to 145-145.5 degrees Celsius. The drop in melting point may suggest the presence of impurities, but the narrow melting point range of the recrystallized solid indicates high purity. One possible explanation is that the recrystallization altered the composition, making it closer to a eutectic mixture, which can exhibit a lower melting point. Another consideration is that the original melting point measurement may have been affected by rapid heating, leading to inaccurate results. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate interpretation of recrystallization outcomes.
scorpion990
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I have a quick question:
Suppose that you observed a solid melting at 150 degrees - 160 degrees Celsius. Once it is recrystallized, the observed melting point drops to 145-145.5 degrees Celsius. How can this be?

At first, I thought it was due to an impurity, which would act to lower the melting point. However, the melting point of the recrystallized solid is very narrow, so it is probably quite pure. Then again, the recrystallized mixture might be eutectic, which would explain the sharp melting point. But then again... How is it possible to contaminate a sample that badly?

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reaction with solvent?
 
Perhaps during the measurement of the first melting point, the sample was heated too quickly so that melting wasn't observed until the chamber was at a temperature higher than the real melting point.
 
scorpion990 said:
I have a quick question:
Suppose that you observed a solid melting at 150 degrees - 160 degrees Celsius. Once it is recrystallized, the observed melting point drops to 145-145.5 degrees Celsius. How can this be?

At first, I thought it was due to an impurity, which would act to lower the melting point. However, the melting point of the recrystallized solid is very narrow, so it is probably quite pure. Then again, the recrystallized mixture might be eutectic, which would explain the sharp melting point. But then again... How is it possible to contaminate a sample that badly?

Any help is appreciated.

I'm not an expert on this topic however your last assumption is probably correct , you have have simply altered the original composition so that the mixture is closer to the eutectic composition. What are you working with?
 
It's not real data. Rather, it's just a question I have to answer and attach to my lab.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top