MHB Basics of Field Extensions .... .... Ireland and Rosen, Ch 12

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basics Field
Click For Summary
In the discussion on Chapter 12 of Ireland and Rosen's book, participants clarify the relationship between elements in a field extension. It is established that if L is a field with a basis over K, then any product of an element from L with a basis element can be expressed as a linear combination of the basis elements. A specific example using L = Q(√2) illustrates how to compute the norm of an element, showing that the determinant of the corresponding matrix yields the norm value. The example provided demonstrates that the norm of the element 3 + 2√2 is 1. This discussion effectively clarifies the algebraic preliminaries necessary for understanding field extensions.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Kenneth Ireland and Michael Rosen's book, "A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory" ... ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 12: Algebraic Number Theory ... ... I need some help in order to follow a basic result in Section 1: Algebraic Preliminaries ...

The start of Section 1 reads as follows:

View attachment 6509
QUESTION 1


In the above text by Ireland and Rosen, we read the following:"... ... Suppose $$\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ ... \ ... \ , \alpha_n$$ is a basis for $$L/K$$ and $$\alpha \in L$$.Then $$\alpha \alpha_i = \sum_j a_{ ij } \alpha_j$$ with $$a_{ ij } \in K$$ ... ... "

My question is ... ... how do Ireland and Rosen get $$\alpha \alpha_i = \sum_j a_{ ij } \alpha_j$$ ... ... ?

My thoughts are as follows ...Given $$L/K$$, we have that $$L$$ is a vector space over $$K$$.

... we then let $$\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ ... \ ... \ , \alpha_n$$ be a basis for $$L$$ as a vector space over $$K$$

( I take it that that is what I&R mean by "... ... Suppose $$\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \ ... \ ... \ , \alpha_n $$is a basis for $$L/K$$")... we then let $$\alpha \in L$$ ... ... then there exist $$a_1, a_2, \ ... \ ... \ , a_n \in K$$ such that $$\alpha = a_1 \alpha_1 + a_2 \alpha_2 + \ ... \ ... \ a_n \alpha_n$$ so that $$\alpha \alpha_i = ( a_1 \alpha_1 + a_2 \alpha_2 + \ ... \ ... \ a_n \alpha_n ) \alpha_i$$ ... ... ... (1)... BUT ...

Ireland and Rosen write (see above)$$\alpha \alpha_i = \sum_j a_{ ij } \alpha_j$$$$= a_{ i1 } \alpha_1 + a_{ i2 } \alpha_2 + \ ... \ ... \ + a_{ in } \alpha_n$$ ... ... ... (2)My question is ... how do we get expression (1) equal to (2) ... ...
QUESTION 2In the above text by Ireland and Rosen, we read the following:"... ...The norm of $$\alpha, N_{ L/K } ( \alpha )$$ is $$text{ det} (a_{ ij } )$$ ... ... I cannot fully understand the process involved in forming the norm ... can someone please explain ... preferably via a simple example ...
Hope someone can help ... Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

It appears you've missed something key here, which is that $L$ is a field. So all the products $\alpha \alpha_i$ belong to $L$. As $L$ is spanned by the $\alpha_j$, each product $\alpha \alpha_i$ is $K$-linear combination of the $\alpha_j$, which is displayed in the formulae

$$\alpha\alpha_i = \sum_{j} a_{ij} \alpha_j, \quad a_{ij}\in K$$
 
To answer your second question, consider $$L = \Bbb Q(\sqrt{2}) = \{a + b\sqrt{2} : a,b\in \Bbb Q\}\quad \text{and}\quad K = \Bbb Q$$ Set $\alpha = 3 + 2\sqrt{2}$. The numbers $1, \sqrt{2}$ form a basis for $L/K$. Further,

$\alpha \cdot 1 = 3 + 2\sqrt{2}$
$\alpha \cdot \sqrt{2} = 4 + 3\sqrt{2}$

Hence, the matrix $(a_{ij})$ of $\alpha$ with respect to the ordered basis $\{1,\sqrt{2}\}$ is given by

$$\begin{pmatrix}3 & 2\\ 4 & 3\end{pmatrix}$$

The determinant of this matrix is $3(3) - 4(2) = 1$, so the norm of $\alpha$, $N_{L/K}(\alpha)$, equals $1$.

As an exercise, show that in general, the norm of an element $a + b\sqrt{2}$ in $Q(\sqrt{2})$ is $a^2 - 2b^2$.
 
Euge said:
Hi Peter,

It appears you've missed something key here, which is that $L$ is a field. So all the products $\alpha \alpha_i$ belong to $L$. As $L$ is spanned by the $\alpha_j$, each product $\alpha \alpha_i$ is $K$-linear combination of the $\alpha_j$, which is displayed in the formulae

$$\alpha\alpha_i = \sum_{j} a_{ij} \alpha_j, \quad a_{ij}\in K$$
Thanks Euge ... yes ... should have known!

Obvious now, of course ... :(

Peter
 
Euge said:
To answer your second question, consider $$L = \Bbb Q(\sqrt{2}) = \{a + b\sqrt{2} : a,b\in \Bbb Q\}\quad \text{and}\quad K = \Bbb Q$$ Set $\alpha = 3 + 2\sqrt{2}$. The numbers $1, \sqrt{2}$ form a basis for $L/K$. Further,

$\alpha \cdot 1 = 3 + 2\sqrt{2}$
$\alpha \cdot \sqrt{2} = 4 + 3\sqrt{2}$

Hence, the matrix $(a_{ij})$ of $\alpha$ with respect to the ordered basis $\{1,\sqrt{2}\}$ is given by

$$\begin{pmatrix}3 & 2\\ 4 & 3\end{pmatrix}$$

The determinant of this matrix is $3(3) - 4(2) = 1$, so the norm of $\alpha$, $N_{L/K}(\alpha)$, equals $1$.

As an exercise, show that in general, the norm of an element $a + b\sqrt{2}$ in $Q(\sqrt{2})$ is $a^2 - 2b^2$.
Thanks Euge ... wonderfully clear and helpful example ...

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K