Bead on a hoop, angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dynamics of a bead on a spinning hoop and its angular momentum. Initially, the bead is at the bottom of the hoop where the slope is zero, resulting in angular momentum directed upward. Despite this, the bead begins to slide up the hoop when the hoop spins, raising questions about the forces acting on it. It is clarified that the bead experiences a radial outward force due to the hoop's rotation, which couples horizontal and vertical movements. Consequently, the bead's motion is restricted to the y-direction as it is confined to the hoop's structure.
CyberShot
Messages
133
Reaction score
2
http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/848/beadt.jpg

In the above problem, the hoop will gain angular momentum, L, in the +y direction. However, initially the bead is on the bottom of the circle where the slope is exactly zero. The angular momentum will therefore point exactly upward (thus the net force acting on the bead is only in the y direction) , and the bead should not move in the x direction, not even the y direction since it's confined to the hoop.

But how is it that the bead angle increases (i.e. the bead slides up the hoop) when the hoop starts to spin, even though L is always in the +y direction and the instantaneous slope is zero initially?

If the bead were given a slight nudge in the +x direction so it's not longer exactly at the bottom, and thus is not on a surface with slope zero, then the bead should start to slide up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the above problem, the hoop will gain angular momentum, L, in the +y direction. However, initially the bead is on the bottom of the circle where the slope is exactly zero. The angular momentum will therefore point exactly upward (thus the net force acting on the bead is only in the y direction) , and the bead should not move in the x direction, not even the y direction since it's confined to the hoop.

this is not quite correct. While the vector of angular momentum is defined as up here via the right hand rule, the force the bead feels will be radially outward, away from the axis of rotation. No matter how hard you spin the hoop, the bead shouldn't go past the horizontal position at the extrema of +/- x.

The bead only moves along y because it is coupled to y through the hoop, horizontal force being transferred to vertical force.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top