Bee Swarm Relativity: Calculating Time with a Messenger Bee

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vern
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
Vern
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
Consider a special swarm of bees of constant size in which each bee always flys at a constant speed. A time keeper bee keeps time by means of a messenger bee that continously circles the swarm. Each time the messenger bee completes a round trip, the swarm's time advances one tick.

An identical stationary swarm, A, sends this swarm, B at swarm speed, V, to settle a new hive. Swarm A wants to start another journey when swarm B's time equals N ticks.

Now swarm A's time keeper bee needs an equation to determine when swarm B's time equals N ticks.

I wonder if this equation would resemble the transformations that help us determine relative things. :smile:

Just curious.

Vern
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This sounds like a very convoluted situation involving time dilation, which is quite simple.

- Warren
 
I was trying to think of a simple situation from which one could develop a Lorentz-like transformation for time dilation. This one should come pretty close :smile:

Vern
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top