Behaviour of an Exponential Commutation

d.hatch75
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Forgive the awkward title, it was hard to think how to describe the problem in such a short space. I'm following the proof of Proposition 1.2 of Nakahara's "Geometry, Topology and Physics", and the following commutation relation has been established:

\partial_x^n e^{ikx} = e^{ikx}(ik + \partial_x )^n

The line immediately afterwards is:

e^{-i\epsilon \{-\partial_x^2 / 2m + V(x)\}}e^{ikx} = e^{ikx}e^{-i\epsilon \{-(ik+\partial_x )^2 / 2m + V(x)\}}

I am not seeing how this follows from the previous relation, since the partial derivative is in the exponential so surely it doesn't act on e^{ikx} in the same way? It seems dodgy, but I can only assume I'm missing some important result concerning exponentials of commutation relationships that hasn't otherwise been specified anywhere in the book as far as I can tell.

Homework Equations


(See above)

The Attempt at a Solution


(See above)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hint: try using the power series expansion of an exponential function.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top