How Can Bell's Inequality Be Transformed into the CHSH Inequality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cscott
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chsh Inequality
cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I need to get the CHSH inequality from Bell's inequality

Homework Equations



|C(a, b) - C(a, b')| + |C(a', b) - C(a', b')| <= 2

to

-2 <= C(a, b) - C(a, b') + C(a', b) + C(a', b') <= 2


The Attempt at a Solution



I know the CHSH allows for no correlation of 0 but I can't get anywhere. I think my math with inequalities just sucks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cscott said:

Homework Statement



I need to get the CHSH inequality from Bell's inequality

Homework Equations



|C(a, b) - C(a, b')| + |C(a', b) - C(a', b')| <= 2

to

-2 <= C(a, b) - C(a, b') + C(a', b) + C(a', b') <= 2


The Attempt at a Solution



I know the CHSH allows for no correlation of 0 but I can't get anywhere. I think my math with inequalities just sucks.

The above looks a bit confused. How about this trick?

(1) (a + a')b + (a - a')b' = +/-2;

since (a + a') = 0 AND (a - a') = +/-2, XOR (a + a') = +/-2 AND (a - a') = 0.

So, expanding (1):

(2) ab + a'b + ab' - a'b' = +/-2.

Then, ensemble-averaging:

(3) <ab> + <a'b> + <ab'> - <a'b'> </= +/-2.

Or:

(4) |<ab> + <a'b> + <ab'> - <a'b'>| </= 2;

where <ab> = C(ab), etc. (4) is known as the CHSH Inequality; and the real trick is to see why EPR-Bell tests cannot (in general) satisfy (4).
 
JenniT said:
The above looks a bit confused. How about this trick?

(1) (a + a')b + (a - a')b' = +/-2;

since (a + a') = 0 AND (a - a') = +/-2, XOR (a + a') = +/-2 AND (a - a') = 0.

So, expanding (1):

(2) ab + a'b + ab' - a'b' = +/-2.

Then, ensemble-averaging:

(3) <ab> + <a'b> + <ab'> - <a'b'> </= +/-2.

Or:

(4) |<ab> + <a'b> + <ab'> - <a'b'>| </= 2;

where <ab> = C(ab), etc. (4) is known as the CHSH Inequality; and the real trick is to see why EPR-Bell tests cannot (in general) satisfy (4).

Very nice answer, sir. Now I'd like to ask what you lead to: why cannot the EPR state satisfy the Bell inequality generally?
 
mmmrrrrrrr said:
Very nice answer, sir. Now I'd like to ask what you lead to: why cannot the EPR state satisfy the Bell inequality generally?

Good question, but it's a homework question at our school. So please follow the PF homework rules.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?

Similar threads

Back
Top