Bell's spaceship clarification

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LAHLH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spaceship
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Bell's spaceship paradox, focusing on the interpretation of a specific explanation regarding the geometry involved in the scenario. Participants explore the implications of the wording in a referenced text and its alignment with the concepts of special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion over the wording in a paragraph about the Bell's spaceship paradox, questioning the consistency of the terms used to describe lines in a Lorentzian framework.
  • Another participant points out potential typos in the original explanation, suggesting that the correct interpretation involves lines of the form x'=constant rather than t'=constant.
  • A participant raises a question about the implications of the distance being greater than gamma*k, referencing a Wiki article that suggests the distance equals gamma*k after acceleration ceases.
  • There is a discussion about whether the paradox is settled, with one participant asserting that it is understood the rope would eventually break.
  • Another participant suggests reviewing an external paper for further insights.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the geometry involved in the paradox, with some agreeing on the presence of typos while others question the implications of the distance measurements. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall status of the paradox.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the confusion may stem from the assumptions made in the referenced explanations and the differences in interpretations based on the state of the system (e.g., during acceleration versus after). There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions and implications of the terms used in the discussion.

LAHLH
Messages
405
Reaction score
2
Hi,

I'm reading the excellent explanation of this paradox at http://www2.corepower.com:8080/~relfaq/spaceship_puzzle.html but have become confused by the wording in this paragraph:

The x'-distance between the curves is actually slightly greater than gamma*k. You can see this by a geometrical construction. Remember that P is point on the left-hand curve, and the t'-axis passes through P and is tangent to that curve. Draw a horizontal line (a line t=constant) through P; let this line cross the right-hand curve at Q. Draw a line parallel to the t'-axis through Q (a line of the form t'=constant). Fact: the x'-axis crosses the two slanted lines, t'=0 and t'=constant, at x'-coordinates 0 and gamma*k, respectively. Since the right-hand curve is tangent to t'=constant at Q, the x'-axis will cross the right-hand curve at x' > gamma*k. [Exercise: rephrase this physically!] [End of bracket convention.]

It could just be me missing something but this paragraph seems contradictory. When he says draw a line parallel to the t'-axis through Q but then in brackets says "a line of the form t'=const", surely these things are opposites? the lines of the form t'=const are perpendicular (in the Lorentzian sense-equal sides of 45 deg null line) to the lines parallel to the t'-axis ? just as in cartesian geometry lines of y=const are perp to the y-axis etc.

So that is my first point of confusion.

Then he talks of the x'-axis crossing the t'=0 line: surely the x'-axis axis is the t'=0 line??

he has totally lost me at this point. The picture I have currently is attached...Just wondering if someone could shed some light on this for me as I was enjoying the explanation up until here.
 

Attachments

  • spaceship.jpg
    spaceship.jpg
    9.6 KB · Views: 461
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
LAHLH, You're right, he has several typos, and they are crucial to the discussion.

"Draw a line parallel to the t'-axis through Q (a line of the form t'=constant). Fact: the x'-axis crosses the two slanted lines, t'=0 and t'=constant, at x'-coordinates 0 and gamma*k, respectively."

should be

"Draw a line parallel to the t'-axis through Q (a line of the form x'=constant). Fact: the x'-axis crosses the two slanted lines, x'=0 and x'=constant, at x'-coordinates 0 and gamma*k, respectively."
 
Ah, thanks a lot!
 
Also the next bit should read
Since the right-hand curve is tangent to x'=constant at Q, the x'-axis will cross the right-hand curve at x' > gamma*k
?

Looking at the Wiki article seems to suggest the distance is = gamma*k, not greater? is this just because the wiki article considers the case after acceleration has ceased (engines turned off)? So effectively the x-axis will cross the curve at x'=gamma*k for this case as the x'=const line remains tangent forever after now the engines are off?

Finally, is this paradox actually settled?
 
LAHLH said:
Also the next bit should read ?

Looking at the Wiki article seems to suggest the distance is = gamma*k, not greater? is this just because the wiki article considers the case after acceleration has ceased (engines turned off)? So effectively the x-axis will cross the curve at x'=gamma*k for this case as the x'=const line remains tangent forever after now the engines are off?
Yes, I think they're assuming we consider the distance in both frames after the ships stop accelerating.
LAHLH said:
Finally, is this paradox actually settled?
Yes, it's understood the rope would eventually break.
 
You may want to look at <http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1919>.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K