Benefits of induction coil over an alternator?

AI Thread Summary
Induction coils, particularly Tesla coils, are favored for spark gap experiments due to their ability to generate high-voltage discharges, which are essential for replicating early electrical experiments. While a custom-built alternator could theoretically create similar effects, it may not achieve the same voltage levels or efficiency as an induction coil. The complexity of building an induction coil with numerous turns is often justified by the unique electrical characteristics it provides. Concerns about safety and practicality are valid, as induction coils can be dangerous without proper precautions. Overall, the specific benefits of induction coils in spark gap applications outweigh the challenges of their construction.
raezair
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm just wondering about what benefits there are to building / using an induction coil as opposed to other devices to create devices for spark gap experiments.

I am referring to the induction coils with a primary winding and secondary windings with enormous numbers of turns - similar to experiments that I have been seeing that duplicate the experiments of the early electrical pioneers - non induction heating coils.

Wouldn't one be able to create a spark gap, for experimenting with, by use of a custom built alternator to do the same thing as the induction coil does without the requirement of having to build a device that requires up to hundreds of thousands of turns in the secondary winding?

is there any real benefit to using an induction coil?

disclaimer: I'm not an engineer so this is perhaps a very basic question for some of you.

your thoughts??,
thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You are describing a Tesla Coil. Those can be dangerous, but with the right precautions, a good project.

But an old fashioned auto ignition system doesn't need a Tesla Coil, or a secondary.

raezair said:
a device that requires up to hundreds of thousands of turns in the secondary winding?
That statement makes me suspect that you are very unrealistic in your expectations. Probably that was the reason nobody else answered until now.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top