Bessels Equation J(κx) instead of J(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter gmanmtb
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that J(κx) is a solution to the Bessel's equation of order p, specifically the equation x²y'' + xy' + (κ²x² - p²)y = 0. The method involves substituting \(\widetilde{x} = κx\) and applying the chain rule to derive the necessary derivatives. The key steps include changing the independent variable to \(\overline{x} = kx\) and computing the derivatives in terms of \(\overline{x}\) to demonstrate that J(κx) satisfies the original equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bessel's equation and its solutions, specifically Jp(x).
  • Familiarity with calculus concepts such as the chain rule and derivatives.
  • Knowledge of series expansions and the Gamma function.
  • Ability to manipulate independent variables in differential equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Bessel functions, particularly Jp(x) and their applications.
  • Learn about the chain rule in calculus and its application in differential equations.
  • Explore the derivation of Bessel's equation from physical applications, such as wave equations.
  • Investigate the use of variable substitutions in solving differential equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying differential equations, mathematicians working with Bessel functions, and anyone involved in applied mathematics or physics requiring an understanding of Bessel's equation solutions.

gmanmtb
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I seem to be stuck trying to prove this one, I'm not sure if I'm headed down the right path or just missing something obvious

Homework Statement


The equation x2y''+xy'+(κ2x2-p2)y=0, where κ constant, appears frequently in applications. Prove that J(κx) is a solution by changing the form of Bessel's equation of order p. Do this by letting \widetilde{x}=κx in the above equation and apply the chain rule.

Homework Equations


Well the first solution of Bessel's equation is
Jp(x)=\sum^{\infty}_{k=0}\frac{(-1)^{k}}{k!\Gamma(k+p+1)}(\frac{x}{2})^{2k+p}

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe the method I should be using is to use y(x)=Jp(κx)=Jp(\widetilde{x}) but from there I can derive y'=\sum^{\infty}_{k=1}\frac{(-1)^{k}(2k+p)}{k!\Gamma(k+p+1)}(\frac{\widetilde{x}}{2})^{2k+p-1} and y''=\sum^{\infty}_{k=2}\frac{(-1)^{k}(2k+p)(2k+p-1)}{k!\Gamma(k+p+1)}(\frac{\widetilde{x}}{2})^{2k+p-2} but from there I get fuzzy, I can't replace \widetilde{x}=κx in a way that works out.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Make a change of indepedent variable and then solve for y in terms of \overline{x}

For example, if \overline{x}=kx, then:

\frac{dy}{d\overline{x}}=\frac{dy}{dx}\frac{1}{k}

solve for dy/dx, then compute the second derivative in terms of \overline{x}, solve for d^2y/dx^2, then substitute those into the original equation to obtain an equation in y(\overline{x}) for which J(\overline{x}) is a solution, that is, J(kx).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K