Other Best Search Engines for Academic Papers - arXiv and Beyond

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effectiveness of various search engines for academic papers, particularly in the field of physics. ArXiv is mentioned as a repository rather than a search engine, with participants noting its usefulness for specific subject searches. Google Scholar is highlighted as a primary tool for scholarly searches, praised for its ability to locate papers not only from arXiv but also from other sources. Users emphasize the importance of refining search terms to enhance search results. Additionally, the value of following citation trails is discussed, as it helps discover significant papers and authors in a given field. Tracking citations of one's own work is also mentioned as a way to stay informed about relevant research.
Thomaz
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
What are the best search engines of academic papers in your opinion?

as of right now I'm only searching on arXiv :(
 
  • Like
Likes Aufbauwerk 2045
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you heard of Google Scholar?

ArXiv is not a search engine. It is a repository.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes Thomaz
ZapperZ said:
Have you heard of Google Scholar?

ArXiv is not a search engine. It is a repository.

Zz.

I meant that when a need to search for a paper in a specific subject i search there :D

how good is google scholar? Any other better for physics?

thnks for your answer :)
 
Thomaz said:
I meant that when a need to search for a paper in a specific subject i search there :D

how good is google scholar? Any other better for physics?

thnks for your answer :)

Google Scholar will find anything at arXiv and often lots of papers that are not at arXiv. Like any search engine, how well it works depends on the search terms you use, and one needs to develop skill selecting and refining the search terms used in a given field and literature search.

Google Scholar is the first search engine I turn to for scholarly searches, and it is sufficient to get started most of the time, but there are occasions where I use the search features of specific repositories like DTIC or arXiv or even specific publishing organizations.

But skillful literature reviews often go beyond these kinds of searches. Most important papers I find are found by following the "paper trails" of other papers. Which papers are cited by important papers I've already found? Which papers later cite the important papers I've already found? What else on the subject has been written by authors who seem to be important and knowledgeable on the subject? Once I've published in a field, I also track who is citing MY papers. If someone thinks my paper is important enough to cite, odds are good they're bringing valuable new information both in their study itself and in the other papers they've cited and written.
 
  • Like
Likes Thomaz
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top