Beta particle counting efficiency?

AI Thread Summary
Counting efficiency refers to the ratio of detected pulses to the actual number of emitted particles from a source. In the context of a shielded beta counter with 85.7% efficiency that accumulated 845 counts in a week, this means approximately 986 beta particles were emitted during that time. Factors affecting counting efficiency include geometric effects and absorption by media and detector structures. The provided efficiency typically encompasses all relevant aspects such as nuclide type, energy, and materials. This understanding can be applied to calculate decay rates and activity levels in radioactive samples.
wendo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Beta particle counting efficiency??

Hi!

Can anyone tell me what counting efficiency means? For example if it's put into a question as: "shielded beta counter with 85.7% counting efficiency, 845 counts are accumulated in one week" what does it mean?

How I understand it so far is that it's the ratio between the number of particles counted : # of particles that's actually emitted... is this correct??

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Counting efficiency (of the detector) is the ratio of pulses detected to the actual events.

If one 'detects' 900 pulses when 1000 beta particles entered the detector, then the efficiency is 900/1000 or 0.9 or 90%.

Then there is also geometric effects, i.e. how many particles which are emitted from the source actually impinge on the detector. Then there is the effect of particles being absorbed by the media (between source and detector) and detector structure which will not be counted.

Is one asking for overall efficiency or counting efficiency of the detector?

Here is a good site for reference -
http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/cat1.html
 
Thanks astronuc for your reply!

The question gives the counting efficiency and overall asking to calculate the age of a piece of wood.

So in this case if counting efficiency is 85.7%, and 845 counts are accumulated in one week, then

.857=845 per week/# of beta particles actually emitted
=986 beta particles that are actually emitted per week?

Can this be used as the decay rate?
 
Yes, when a problem says the counting efficiency is some number, it usually takes into account all aspects that affect efficiency (nuclide, energy, geometry, materials, etc.). You are correct in that 986 is the number of beta particles emitted per week, and his can be used to determine activity.
 
yes it is 986 beta particles per week. We had a similar problem in our testing environment while working on a new https://www.avl.com/particle-counter.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top