Better intuition of what it is I am finding.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sefrez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intuition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the concept of work done on an object as it changes velocity, specifically in relation to different reference frames. The initial and final velocity vectors are given, and the net work is calculated using the kinetic energy formula, W = ΔK. The author questions whether the work calculated is relative to the frame of reference that defines the velocities, suggesting that in a frame where the initial velocity is zero, the work required to change velocity appears different. A key point raised is that the algebraic manipulation of kinetic energy shows that ΔK is not simply based on the change in velocity squared, indicating a need to consider how work is perceived in various inertial frames. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the relativity of work and the importance of reference frames in physics.
Sefrez
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
This is another simple problem that I have probably over thought on and now have some questions.

I am given that the initial velocity of some mass m's vector is v_i = x1 i + y1 j and that its final velocity vector is v_f = x2 i + y2 j. I am then asked to find the net work done on the object that accounted for the change in velocity.

This is simply done by W = ΔK = 0.5m|v_f|^2 - 0.5m|v_i|^2.

I got to thinking though that this must be relative. That is, if you find the change in velocity which would be Δv = v_f - v_i = (x2 - x1) i + (y2 - y1) j. This could then be thought of as a reference frame that observes the final velocity as Δv. In other words, in this reference frame, the initial velocity is zero. That means that the work needed to change its velocity is 0.5m|Δv|^2. This of course is not the same as the work needed from the other reference frame.

Also note, that if at the reference frame that defines the two original velocities (initial, final) where the final has a decrease in velocity, work is negative due to the fact that the force and displacement vectors are in opposite directions.

But going back to the reference frame where initial velocity is 0, applying the same force, the object does move in the direction of the force - because the object is essentially at rest in the current reference frame.


So: Does this mean that in the first calculation of work - this is relative to the frame of reference that initially defined the two velocities? And for the work calculated from the change in the velocity is relative to the reference frame that observes initial velocity as zero?

And if those two are correct, this means then that, work is relative, correct? Maybe this is obvious, maybe not. Possibly even incorrect. Any talk is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sefrez said:
This is another simple problem that I have probably over thought on and now have some questions.

I am given that the initial velocity of some mass m's vector is v_i = x1 i + y1 j and that its final velocity vector is v_f = x2 i + y2 j. I am then asked to find the net work done on the object that accounted for the change in velocity.

This is simply done by W = ΔK = 0.5m|v_f|^2 - 0.5m|v_i|^2.

I got to thinking though that this must be relative. That is, if you find the change in velocity which would be Δv = v_f - v_i = (x2 - x1) i + (y2 - y1) j. This could then be thought of as a reference frame that observes the final velocity as Δv. In other words, in this reference frame, the initial velocity is zero. That means that the work needed to change its velocity is 0.5m|Δv|^2. This of course is not the same as the work needed from the other reference frame.
...
ΔK is not simply 0.5m|Δv|2 if you do the algebra correctly. |Δv|2≠Δ(v2)
ΔK = (1/2)m[Δ(v2)]
= (1/2)m[(vf)2-(vi)2]

= (1/2)m(vf+vi)(vf-vi)​

Now, check to see whether or not this is invariant for various inertial frames of reference.

(Actually, it may not be invariant, but at least you'll be working with the correct quantity.)
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top