Better textbook for analytical mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the comparison between Landau-Lifshitz and Goldstein's texts for studying Analytical Mechanics. Participants agree that Landau-Lifshitz is the superior choice due to its clarity and lack of misconceptions, particularly regarding anholonomous constraints, which are noted as problematic in Goldstein's work. Users recommend Landau-Lifshitz for its polished examples and overall quality. Additionally, John Baez's free online course notes on classical mechanics are highlighted as a valuable supplement, praised for their intuitive explanations of Lagrangian mechanics.
Jianphys17
Messages
66
Reaction score
2
Hi at all.
According to you which of the two texts, between Landau-Lifshitz (mechanics) and the Goldberg (classical mech) is better for study Analytical Mech ? Or there are other better ones ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean Goldstein? If so, then clearly Landau-Lifshitz is the much better choice, because it doesn't contain the severe misconceptions of Goldstein concerning anholonomous constraints (search for vakonomic dynamics in this forum).
 
Yes, Goldstein, I'm apologize for the mistake. Thanks for the suggestion !
 
Landau-Lifshitz, as said, is for sure a better option. Not only it does not contain some misconceptions but it also has better examples and is more polished.
I have used both and would not recommend Goldstein that much
 
Consider as a supplement John Baez's free online course notes on classical mechanics from both the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian perspectives (http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/classical)

I recently discovered them and I'm finding that he truly has a gift for teaching. His explanations of why lagrangians actually work and his lengthy efforts to convey some intuition about WHY kinetic - potential energy should be the Lagrangian we care about in classical mechanics is the most satisfying I've seen across many sources.

Also, interesting...
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/interview-mathematical-physicist-john-baez-part-1
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Jianphys17 and Yan_Dalton
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top