Better than Bell: The GHZM Effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daverz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bell
Daverz
Messages
1,003
Reaction score
80
I wanted to point out some links I found hugely useful and mind expanding. Apologies if this has been posted before (I did search for GHZM).

I've always found my eyes glazing over when trying to follow the derivation of Bell's Inequality, so I was very impressed when I saw this Sidney Coleman lecture.

http://media.physics.harvard.edu/video/index.php?id=SidneyColeman_QMIYF.flv

He describes an experimental arrangement that greatly simplifies the situation and makes the difference between Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics as stark as possible. This is based on the work of Greenberger, Horne and Zeilinger with further simplication by Mermin in this paper (PDF):

http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/QM/mermin_ajp_58_731_90.pdf

Sidney's explanation is a bit quick, so I didn't really get it until reading the paper and then going back to the video.

The rest of Coleman's talk is mindblowing as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top