BIENT TEMPERATURE AND RADIATION EQUILIBRIUM BETWEEN TWO BODIES IN A VACUUM

AI Thread Summary
In a vacuum, a hot body will lose heat through radiation, causing its temperature to decrease over time. The discussion highlights a discrepancy between the user's understanding and the textbook's claim that the hot body's temperature remains constant. It is emphasized that without knowing how the bodies achieved their temperatures, it's difficult to determine the outcome. If the hot body is maintained at a certain temperature by an external source, it can reach thermal equilibrium with its surroundings. Ultimately, the heat transfer process in a vacuum is solely through radiation, not conduction or convection.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
Sir,
Two bodies one hot and other cold are kept in vacuum. What will happen to the temperature of hot body after sometime?
I think that the temperature of the hot body decreases due to radiation as it needs no medium. But the book answer says that it will remain constant. Which is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would expect the hot body to radiate heat and the colder body to absorbed radiated heat until they reach equilibrium with the environment.

Is there no information on the temperatures of the bodies and the surrounding vacuum.

Certainly there is no heat transfer via conduction or convection.
 
Amith2006 said:
Sir,
Two bodies one hot and other cold are kept in vacuum. What will happen to the temperature of hot body after sometime?
I think that the temperature of the hot body decreases due to radiation as it needs no medium. But the book answer says that it will remain constant. Which is correct?
Your textbook seems to have an extraordinary number of wrong answers. What text are you using?

The question should state how the bodies achieved their temperatures. If, for example the hot one is hot because the sun is shining on it, so long as the sun keeps shining it will reach and keep an equilibrium temperature at which its rate of energy absorption equals its rate of emission.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top