Bike Wheel Question: Kinetic Energy Lost on Impact

  • Thread starter Thread starter rtsswmdktbmhw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bike Wheel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the kinetic energy lost when a dart strikes a bicycle wheel and sticks to it. Participants explore whether to calculate energy loss quantitatively or qualitatively, noting that some energy will be lost due to friction and the inelastic nature of the collision. The conversation emphasizes that while the dart's angular momentum can be calculated about the wheel's axis, the primary focus should be on the conservation of momentum rather than energy. It is highlighted that if the dart's path were aligned with the wheel's axis, all kinetic energy would be lost, resulting in the wheel not turning. Ultimately, the exercise aims to derive a formula that quantifies the percentage of energy lost during the impact.
rtsswmdktbmhw
Messages
38
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Bicycle wheel is at rest, and can rotate frictionlessly about a fixed axle. A dart travels at velocity v (in plane of wheel) parallel to a line that goes through the centre of the wheel. It hits the rim of the wheel and sticks.

What kinetic energy, if any, is lost during impact?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought about something like 'the kinetic energy whose component is perpendicular to the rim of the wheel at impact is lost', but energy is scalar so that didn't seem right. Is there some better worded solution/reasoning? Perhaps the fixed axle buffers the wheel and so some kinetic energy is lost?

Or, am I supposed to answer these types of questions simply by directly calculating before/after?

Also (as an aside), is it correct to take the angular momentum of the dart simply to be about the axis of the wheel, and = ##\vec r\times \vec p## at the instant it hits the rim? (I haven't included the relevant question here.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The dart comes to standstill and the wheel is not rotating! Read! Think! Don't just reproduce info.
 
andrevdh said:
The dart comes to standstill and the wheel is not rotating! Read! Think! Don't just reproduce info.
The dart is not brought to a complete standstill, it starts the wheel turning.
 
That is what happens if you do not read carefully!
Some energy will be lost due to the work being done against friction upon entry,
but it will be minimal due to the sharp point.
 
I think the expectation is for some equations to quantify the loss of energy. Perhaps the loss could be related to the perpendicular distance of the incoming dart's path from a parallel path through the wheel axle.
 
andrevdh said:
That is what happens if you do not read carefully!
Some energy will be lost due to the work being done against friction upon entry,
but it will be minimal due to the sharp point.
What friction is this? Is it due to the fact that the dart stuck to the rim? Wikipedia says that inelastic collision is one where the two objects e.g. carts stick after collision, but I wasn't sure if that would apply here since that dart has a sharp end.
NascentOxygen said:
I think the expectation is for some equations to quantify the loss of energy. Perhaps the loss could be related to the perpendicular distance of the incoming dart's path from a parallel path through the wheel axle.
Yes, this is usually what I would do as it's probably the most straightforward way.. But some of the solutions I have been given to similar questions have been qualitative, so I wasn't too sure if quantifying it was the expected approach.

If quantifying, then it would just be 0.5*m*v^2 of dart = 0.5*I*omega^2 (wheel + dart after collision) right?
 
rtsswmdktbmhw said:
If quantifying, then it would just be 0.5*m*v^2 of dart = 0.5*I*omega^2 (wheel + dart after collision) right?
Energies? You're assuming energy is conserved, but it won't be. The whole aim of the exercise, IMO, is to arrive at a formula that shows what percent of the energy is lost. (Remember, a "currency" that is conserved during the exchange is momentum.)

If the dart were incoming on a path directed through the wheel's axis, then all energy would be lost. The dart would halt and the wheel would not be turned.
 
Oh, whoops, I meant comparing, not equating, the 0.5*m*v^2 (before collision) with 0.5*I*omega^2 (after collision), where I is the rotational inertia of wheel+dart and omega can be worked out via conservation of angular momentum.
 
andrevdh said:
That is what happens if you do not read carefully!
Some energy will be lost due to the work being done against friction upon entry,
but it will be minimal due to the sharp point.
I believe this should be treated as a completely inelastic collision. Mechanical energy will be lost both to friction and to vibrations in the wheel, but that's unimportant here.
 
  • #10
NascentOxygen said:
a "currency" that is conserved during the exchange is momentum.
Umm, no. It's mounted on a fixed axle, and there will be an unknown reaction from that.
rtsswmdktbmhw said:
is it correct to take the angular momentum of the dart simply to be about the axis of the wheel,
It's not that the angular momentum is about any particular axis; you choose your axis and calculate the angular momentum about it.
rtsswmdktbmhw said:
and = r⃗ ×p⃗ \vec r\times \vec p at the instant it hits the rim? (I haven't included the relevant question here.)
Yes, and it is relevant to this question.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top