Binomial expansion of a function with x raised to a power

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2
Hey guys.

So I need to know how to Binomial expand the following function
\frac{1}{(1-x^{2})}.

I need this because I have to work out \prod^{∞}_{i=1}\frac{1}{(1-x^{i})} for i up to 6. But I have to do it with Binomial expansion. If i can learn how to do \frac{1}{(1-x^{2})} then the rest of the powers should be the same.

I was under the impression that \frac{1}{(1-x^{2})} can be binomial expanded as

1+(-1)(-x^{2})+(-1)(-2)\frac{(-x^{2})^{2}}{2!}+(-1)(-2)(-3)\frac{(-x^{2})^{3}}{3!}+...

Is that correct?

Thanks guys!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is correct, and you probably want to observe that
(-1)/1! = -1
(-1)(-2)/2! = 1
(-1)(-2)(-3)/3! = -1

and you can probably guess the pattern as you continue.
 
Wait, wait- don't tell me. I'm still working on it!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top