Binomial Theorem and Electric Field question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying the binomial theorem to approximate the electric field at point P due to a configuration of three point charges. The user struggles to derive a simpler expression for the electric field, particularly in part b of the problem, where they need to show how to arrive at the professor's answer of 6kQa^2/r^4 under the condition r>>a. They initially calculate the electric field components but find it challenging to simplify the expressions using the binomial theorem, expressing confusion about its relevance. Suggestions include factoring out terms and applying the geometric series approach, but the user remains focused on fulfilling the professor's requirement to use the binomial theorem. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying mathematical approximations in physics problems.
doubleUTF
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm having a lot of trouble solving for part b as I am unable to correctly apply the binomial theorem to this approximation. The problem is shown below:

Three point charges are distributed: a positive charge +2Q in the center, and a pair of negative charges -Q, a distance a to its left and right.

You want to find the electric field E at point P, a distance r to the right of the positive charge.

a) Write an exact expression for the x-component of E at point P (in terms of Q,r,a, etc.

b) Using the binomial theorem, write a simpler approximation to the expression you gave in part b, which is valid when r>>a


Homework Equations


Binomial theorem: (1+x)^n=1+nx+n(n-1)x^2/2!+...

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I added the vector sum of all forces and got 1/(4pi epsilon knot)(-Q/(r+a)^2+(2Q)/r^2+(Q)/(r-a)^2

b) The professor gave out the answer for this part which is 6kQa^2/r^4, but we need to show how we got this. I go as far as KQ(2-(a-2a/r)-(1+2a/r))r^2, but I don't know how to proceed further. I wish I knew how to type out the work more neatly so you can see clearly. I would greatly appreciate any feedback.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how the binomial theorem is relevant here. What you need to know is the sum of a geometric series:

1+z+z^2+z^3+\dots=\frac{1}{1-z}

This holds for for all complex z with |z|<1. Proof:

1+z+z^2+\dots+z^n=\frac{(1-z)(1+z+z^2+\dots+z^n)}{1-z}=\frac{1-z^{n+1}}{1-z}

Now take the limit n\rightarrow\infty.

To solve b), I suggest you take -Q/r^2 outside the parentheses. Use the formula for the sum of a geometric series with z=a/r and z=-a/r. Keep terms up to second order and ignore higher order terms.
 
Last edited:
Not to blow off your response, but our professor specifically asked that we utilized the binomial theorem to write a simpler approximation. Plus we were never taught to apply geometric series to this problem. This is what I did:<br /> K = \frac{1}{{4 \pi \varepsilon_0}<br />

from part (a), (E_{net})_x = KQ (\frac{2}{r^2} - \frac{1}{(r+a)^2} -\frac{1}{(r-a)^2}) \vec{i}

and \frac{1}{(r-a)^{2}} = (r-a)^{-2} = r^-2[1-\frac{a}{r}]^-2
& \frac{1}{(r+a)^2} = r^-2 [1+\frac{a}{r}]^-2

So when r>>a, (E_{net})_x=KQ (\frac{2}{r^2} - \frac{1}{(r+a)^2} - \frac{1}{(r-a)^2}) \vec{i}=\? = \frac{6KQa^2}{r^4}<br />
Sorry I'm having trouble with this LaTeX code, but hopefully you can make out what I did.
I'm lost in the part where I placed the question marks.
 
Last edited:
OK, its not that bad. In your expression for the electric field, kq(-1/r^2+ (r+a)^{-2} -(r+2a)^{-2}, ((r+1)-1)^{-2}. Here, expand (r+a)^{-2}, (r+2a)^{-2} binomially, giving you 1-2ra +(higher terms) +1-ra +higher terms+1-2(r-1). Ignoring the higher terms of the expansion as r<<a, you get 1-3ra-2r. Dunno how you got that answer though.
 
I find it very hard to believe that the binomial theorem can have any relevance here. You have already found that

E=-\frac{KQ}{r^2}\big(\big(\frac{1}{1-z}\big)^2-2+\big(\frac{1}{1+z}\big)^2\big)

where z=a/r. It's easy to simplify this to the answer you want if you just do what I suggested before.

Edit: I got the opposite sign in the final answer.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top