Binomial theprem and expansion

rohan03
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
(1+x)^n=1+nx/1!+(n(n-1) x^2)/2!+⋯+ what are the last few terms of this ? I looked and tried but don't seem to get any textbook answer for this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hi rohan03! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 buttons just above the Reply box :wink:)

the binomial coefficients are symmetric (nCr = nCn-r),

so it ends … + n(n-1) xn-2/2! + nxn-1/1! + xn :wink:
 
Thank you . Can I prove with the help of this :
(1+n)n ≥ 5/2nn- 1/2n n-1
 
and if yes - please guide on how
 
rohan03 said:
Thank you . Can I prove with the help of this :
(1+n)n ≥ 5/2nn- 1/2n n-1

just write out the last three terms …

what do you get? :smile:
 
This was also posted under "homework" so I am closing this thread.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top