Biological Physics (BioPhysics) + Kinematics

AI Thread Summary
Kinematics plays a limited role in molecular biophysics, primarily being more relevant in understanding larger biological systems, such as skeletal muscle motion and balance. While foundational concepts from first-year physics, including forces and tension, are beneficial, the molecular scale often involves different dynamics where viscous forces dominate, making traditional kinematics less applicable. Biophysics encompasses a range of topics, from protein folding to the application of physical principles in biological modeling. Advanced areas of study often require knowledge of statistical mechanics, fluid mechanics, and differential equations. For those studying biotechnology without a specific biophysics course, grasping fundamental physics concepts is still valuable, particularly for techniques like optical tweezers, which are used to analyze protein behavior. Recommended introductory texts include "Elementary Biophysics" by Srivastava and "Molecular Driving Forces" by Dill and Bromberg.
BioCore
Hey everyone,

I was interested in knowing what the application if it is large kinematics plays in Biophysics? Particularly or actually mostly Molecular Biophysics. Is it used largely by Biophysicists or are more advanced topics and concepts the prevalent thought in this field?

I primarily ask because I am currently planning on studying Biotechnology, which has no particular course in Biophysics as a requirement. I would love to though study some of the concepts from Biophysics and so I am currently doing a first year Calculus based Physics course. Now I wanted to know if I should spend a lot of time on the concepts or move on since my Professor is moving on to Forces next lecture.

I know that I have to follow the Professor which I will, but I wanted to see if I need a strong grasp in kinematics for understanding in Biophysics?

Thanks.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
kinematics is used a lot in understanding skeletal muscle motion and balance (walking). At the molecular level, I have not seen much kinematics.

"Biophysics" means different things to different people. Some people consider protein folding to be biophysics. Others consider biophysics to be a general application of physical principles to model biological systems.

There does not appear to be an ideal introductory biophysics text; I like "Elementary Biophysics", by Srivastava and "Molecular Driving Forces" by Dill and Bromberg.
 
To some (including me partially), biophysics involves the application of tools from physics to solve biological problems. The use of many of these tools involves knowing important concepts from a 1st year physics course. For example, optical tweezers are used in molecular biophysics to pull on proteins in order to study their motion, folding, and other aspects of their function. Here a knowledge of forces, tension, torque, etc. are useful. Furthermore, for both optical tweezers and other techniques using lasers (e.g. microscopy, various fluorescence-based tools), a knowledge of E&M and optics is useful.

Biophysics also involves studying the physical aspects of biological systems. Here, more advanced topics in math/physics are involved, including statistical mechanics, fluid mechanics, and nonlinear systems of differential equations. Kinematics, as it is taught in 1st year physics, isn't terribly useful in molecular biophysics, because different forces dominate on the molecular scale. Whereas 1st year physics courses tend to ignore the effects of friction and viscosity, viscous forces dominate on the molecular regime. An interesting discussion of this can be found in the paper "Life at Low Reynolds Number" by Ed Purcell (physics forums isn't letting me post a link, so type the title into google to find the article, or use the following doi: 10.1119/1.10903).
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Back
Top