Biophysics: Is it Right for Your Interests?

AI Thread Summary
Biophysics is an interdisciplinary field that integrates physics, biology, chemistry, engineering, and mathematics to address biological problems. It emphasizes the physical principles underlying biological systems, such as drug diffusion in tissues or cell counting techniques, often requiring collaboration among experts from various scientific backgrounds. For students torn between pursuing physics or biology, starting with a general science program is advisable to explore interests before specializing. Biophysics at the undergraduate level is more mathematically oriented and focuses on the mechanics of biological systems rather than the identification of biological components like proteins or genes. Those interested in neuroscience can apply biophysical methods to model neural networks and brain functions. Ultimately, the choice between biophysics and a broader biology major depends on individual interests in theory versus experimental work.
Frushe
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
As the title says, I want to know which is the area of study of Biophysics. I am really interested in physics because of how interesting everything is. But also I have a great interest on subjects like neuroscience and genetics. Do you think biophysics would be good? Or better go with a biology major?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Biophysics is a broad and interdisciplinary field with contributors from various disciplines. It's driven largely by problems in biology and the people trying to solve them bring different tools to the table. A biologist who wants to model the diffusion of a certain drug through a tissue might contact a physicist who has experience in that area rather than re-inventing the wheel. Or if she or he wants to develop a new way of counting certain types of cells drawn in a sample she or he might contact a physicist who can figure out how to light scatters differently through the different cells and develop a system for measuring that. Biologists and physicists aren't exclusive to the group either. You have chemists, engineers, mathematicians, neuroscientists, who also make significant and even leading contributions to the field.

Going into undergraduate studies is a difficult time to know what kinds of problems you would really enjoy working on because most people don't have a lot of experience at that age to make an informed decision. That's why it's usually a good idea to avoid too much specialization too early.

If you're unsure of even a decision between physics and biology, you might want to start by enrolling a general science program and take a first year or study that would qualify you to go either route. Spend that first year concentrating on your courses, but also talking with senior students, and even graduate students if you can. Then make the decision as you go into your second year.
 
The difference is in how they approach problems. I have several friends currently doing PhDs in biophysics. At the undergrad level it is much more mathematical than biology and focuses on how biological systems work in a physical sense rather than identifying important things like proteins, genes, etc. you work on problems involving things like the responses of living systems/cells/membranes under mechanical or chemical stress, thermodynamics/statistical mechanics involving cellular processes like protein folding or forming certain structures. For neuroscience you can study neural networks to model connections between neurons in the brain.
 
Good for what? And even if you told us that, a 'biology major' is too broad a term to be of any use comparing.
 
Do you prefer theory or experiment?
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top