Biot and Savart Integral using Vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter eliw00d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Vectors
eliw00d
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How would I go about setting up a Biot and Savart Integral using Vectors?

Here is an exercise we had in class:
An L-shaped current carrying conductor has its elbow on the origin with one leg of length L points in the positive x-direction and one leg of length L points in the positive y-direction. The current I is flowing toward the negative x-direction and then toward the positive y-direction. The point P is located at a distance of L/2 above the horizontal segment and L/2 to the right of the vertical segment.

Use the Biot-Savart Law to find a general formula for the magnetic field at point P in terms of μ0, I and L.

I tried to set it up using Vectors, and figured dl to be <-L,L> and r to be <½L, -½L>. After the cross product, I am not sure how to handle the integration, since r can vary. Would it be a double integral, or am I overthinking it?

The instructor gave me the answer, and I have been trying to figure out a way to use Vectors to solve it, since I am fairly comfortable with them. Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not a double integral. The sum of two line integrals.
 
Alright, so I split it up into two parts, r1 and r2.

Both have a magnitude of L / sqrt(2).
r1 has a direction vector of <√2 / 2, √2 / 2, 0>,
r2 has a direction vector of <√2 / 2, -√2 / 2, 0>.

Then, dl1 is <-L, 0, 0> and dl2 is <0, L, 0>.

Both cross products are L * (√2 / 2) in (-k) direction.

Do I integrate from L to 0 for the horizontal part, and 0 to L for the vertical part?

The answer he supplied is (μ0 / 4π) * (I * (√2 / L)) in (-k) direction, but I am not getting the same answer.
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top