BJT Inverter with Feedback: Vin-Vout Characteristic & Saturation Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter hogrampage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bjt Inverter
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
5 replies · 3K views
hogrampage
Messages
107
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The circuit in the figure has the form of a BJT inverter, but also has a resistor connected between the emitter lead and ground. This addition provides feedback between the output loop of the circuit and its input loop.

(a) Find an exact expression for the Vin-Vout transfer characteristic over the region where Q1 operates in the constant-current region.

(b) To what does your expression reduce to for large βf?

(c) At what value of Vin does Q1 first turn on?

(d) When Q1 saturates, what will be the value of Vout?

(e) At what approximate value of Vin will Q1 first go into saturation?

(f) For VCC = 12V, RC = 4.7kΩ, RE, large βF, Vsat ≈ 0.2V, and Vf ≈ 0.7V, draw the approximate transfer characteristic of the circuit.

(g) The approximate expression obtained in part (b) will overestimate the actual gain of the circuit found in part (a). How large must βF be for the approximation to overestimate the gain by no more than 10%?

Homework Equations


KVL

In the constant-current region:
iC = βFiB
Vout has the form Vout = mVin + b​

The Attempt at a Solution


iE = iB + iC = iB + βFiB = iB(1 + βF)

KVL input loop:
[1] iB = [itex]\frac{V_{in} - V_{f}}{R_{B} + R_{E}(1 + β_{F})}[/itex]​

KVL output loop:

[2] Vout = VCC - iCRC - iERE

[3] Vout = VCC - βFiBRC - iBRE(1 + βF)

[4] Vout = VCC - iB(βFRC + RE(1 + βF))​

Part (a)

If I combine equations [1] and [4]:

[5] Vout = VCC - [itex]\frac{V_{in} - V_{f}}{R_{B} + R_{E}(1 + β_{F})}[/itex](βFRC + RE(1 + βF))​

I want to know if I'm headed in the right direction and where to go from here. Any guidance is greatly appreciated!

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0071.jpg
    IMG_0071.jpg
    29.5 KB · Views: 518
Physics news on Phys.org
hogrampage said:

Homework Statement


The circuit in the figure has the form of a BJT inverter, but also has a resistor connected between the emitter lead and ground. This addition provides feedback between the output loop of the circuit and its input loop.

(a) Find an exact expression for the Vin-Vout transfer characteristic over the region where Q1 operates in the constant-current region.

(b) To what does your expression reduce to for large βf?

(c) At what value of Vin does Q1 first turn on?

(d) When Q1 saturates, what will be the value of Vout?

(e) At what approximate value of Vin will Q1 first go into saturation?

(f) For VCC = 12V, RC = 4.7kΩ, RE, large βF, Vsat ≈ 0.2V, and Vf ≈ 0.7V, draw the approximate transfer characteristic of the circuit.

(g) The approximate expression obtained in part (b) will overestimate the actual gain of the circuit found in part (a). How large must βF be for the approximation to overestimate the gain by no more than 10%?

Homework Equations


KVL

In the constant-current region:
iC = βFiB
Vout has the form Vout = mVin + b​

The Attempt at a Solution


iE = iB + iC = iB + βFiB = iB(1 + βF)

KVL input loop:
[1] iB = [itex]\frac{V_{in} - V_{f}}{R_{B} + R_{E}(1 + β_{F})}[/itex]​

KVL output loop:

[2] Vout = VCC - iCRC - iERE
​

No. Vout is collector voltage with respect to ground. Vout is not Vc - Ve.​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, oops. Vout = VCC - iCRC, so:

Vout = VCC - [itex]\frac{V_{in} - V_{f}}{R_{B} + R_{E}(1 + β_{F})}[/itex]RCβF

I still don't see what it would reduce to with a large beta :|.
 
Last edited:
hogrampage said:
Oh, oops. Vout = VCC - iCRC, so:

Vout = VCC - [itex]\frac{V_{in} - V_{f}}{R_{B} + R_{E}(1 + β_{F})}[/itex]RCβF

I still don't see what it would reduce to with a large beta :|.

Just put in a large beta. What does the equation simplify to?
 
Maybe I'm blind, as I don't see what it would simplify to. Would it cause RB + RE to be ignored in the denominator? Then, the two beta values would cancel from the top/bottom? So:

[itex]\frac{(V_{in} - V_{f})R_{C}}{R_{E}}[/itex]
 
hogrampage said:
Maybe I'm blind, as I don't see what it would simplify to. Would it cause RB + RE to be ignored in the denominator? Then, the two beta values would cancel from the top/bottom? So:

[itex]\frac{(V_{in} - V_{f})R_{C}}{R_{E}}[/itex]

Yes, Rc/Re would be the gain.