I Black body, angle of incidence

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that while a black body absorbs all incident electromagnetic radiation regardless of angle, the effective power absorbed from sunlight at an angle of incidence, such as 30 degrees, is reduced due to the cosine effect, which accounts for the projected area. When a surface like a sheet of paper is tilted, the same amount of light spreads over a larger area, resulting in a decrease in power per unit area. This principle explains seasonal temperature variations, as the sun's lower angle in winter leads to less solar radiation per square meter. The unique characteristic of black bodies is their ability to absorb all radiation, while non-black bodies reflect some, causing their absorption behavior to differ from the cosine law. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the physics of light absorption and its practical implications.
Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47
I'm trying to understand the solution to an exercise.
The solution claims that that the absorbed power of a black body from sunlight with an angle of incidence of ##30^\circ## is
##P=P_0\cos(30^\circ)##
The reasoning here being to take the component orthogonal to the surface.

However what puzzles me is that wikipedia article on black body https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body
says that "A black body is an idealized physical body that absorbs all incident electromagnetic radiation, regardless of frequency or angle of incidence."

Shouldn't this mean that all the power should be absorbed regardless of the angle of incidence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine holding a sheet of paper flat on a table, absorbing some amount of power from a lightbulb directly overhead. What happens to the total power falling on the sheet if you tip it away from horizontal?
 
  • Like
Likes Incand
I actually tried to do that experiment now! It's hard to tell with only the eyes and with other light sources around but the paper does indeed seem to get darker.

So if we consider a small portion of the light what happens when we tilt the paper is that the same amount of light is distributed over a larger surface. So if the light enter with angle ##\theta## the area of our small portion of light is distributed over ##A=A_0/ \cos \theta## and then the power per area is ##P = P_0/A = P_0 \cos \theta / A_0##. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
Experimental test - nice.

On a large scale this is why winter is colder than summer. In northern hemisphere winter the north pole points away from the sun, so the sun is lower in the sky at noon than in summer (when the north pole is tilted towards the sun). The more oblique angle means less solar radiation per square meter of ground, which makes it colder.

The special thing about black bodies is that they absorb all the radiation falling on them at any angle. The cosine behaviour comes from the projected area as you've seen. Non-black bodies reflect some fraction of the radiation, and the fraction may vary at different angles, so their behaviour may vary from the cosine.
 
  • Like
Likes Incand
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top