Black hole can regard as most efficency mass-energy convecter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter magnetar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
magnetar
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Black hole can regard as most efficency mass-energy converter?

With black hole and hawking radiation's help, i come up with an idea to convert my apple completely into pure energy without another antimatter apple:biggrin:

I throw my apple into a black hole , eventually my apple will convert into hawking radiation—pure energy(particle and antiparticle will annihilate each other into photons).

The net result is my apple completely convert into pure energy!:-p
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy you get out of Hawking radiation is hardly 'pure' since it's pretty much as useless energy as you can find. For example, a human can easily use a fraction of the energy stored in an apple by eating it, but there's absolutely no way to build a machine which could utilize ANY energy stored in extremely cold thermal radiation.
 
And the correct word is "convert", not "convect".
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top