Black Hole Temperature: Stephen Hawking Equation & Calculation Results

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on Stephen Hawking's equation for calculating the temperature of a black hole, specifically T = hc^2 / 16∏^2GMk. A participant calculated the temperature of a black hole with the mass of the sun to be approximately 0.57° but was corrected to about 10^-8 K due to a missing factor of the speed of light. The conversation highlights the importance of using the correct constants and variables in calculations, noting the difference between using h and ħ. Participants recommend using Google for quick calculations, as it can handle fundamental constants and units effectively. The thread emphasizes the nuances in black hole temperature calculations and the utility of online resources.
sabanation12
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Ok so first I know that this equation was presented by Stephen Hawking to describe to Temperature of a black hole:

T = hc2 / 16∏2GMk

so I did the calculations and got that the temperature of a black hole with the mass of our sun would be ≈ .57°

Is this right? Is this the right equation?

Here is what I used for the variables can you guys check if these are correct?:

g = 6.67*10^-11

h = 62606956*10^-34

k = 1.3806583*10^-23

and then just the mass of our sun and the speed of light

Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
I'm getting closer to 10-16 °K, so a Black Hole Sun would evaporate very slowly, unlike the Soundgarden video.
 
Looks like you missed a factor of the speed of light in your equation. Should be:

T = {h c^3 \over 16\pi^2 GMk}

Anyway, the easiest way to calculate these things is to just plug them into Google. The Google calculator knows about units, fundamental constants, and a lot of common values, so you can simply type in:

h*c^3/(16*pi^2*G*(mass of sun)*k)

...to Google, and it will give you the right result (about 10^-8 K).

Oh, and there's also a nifty calculator for all of the values related to a black hole:
http://xaonon.dyndns.org/hawking/
 
Shouldn't that be \hbar c^3 / 8 \pi GMk or did I miss something?
 
Chronos said:
Shouldn't that be \hbar c^3 / 8 \pi GMk or did I miss something?
It's just a difference of whether to use h or \hbar :)
 
My error, I am so accustomed to hbar I overlooked the obvious equivalence.
 
Thanks for your help guys! And thanks Chalnoth for the calculator and link :)
 
Back
Top