Black Holes: Does Bob Survive Falling In?

Zack Davis
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Supposing a man named Bob falls into a black hole, an instant of Bob's perceived time would be a nearly infinite amount of time to the rest of the universe due to relativity and the effects it has in and near black holes. Okay sure, but we also know (to my knowledge) that black holes "evaporate" over time. Could it be that the instant Bob gets sucked in, (an instant in his perceived time) the black hole dissipates (because it has evaporated over countless years, as perceived by an outside observer) leaving Bob completely unharmed?
Please clarify this. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bob's perception of time is that it flows normally and the black hole makes no changes during the brief time he is alive as an observer.
 
Zack Davis said:
Supposing a man named Bob falls into a black hole, an instant of Bob's perceived time would be a nearly infinite amount of time to the rest of the universe due to relativity and the effects it has in and near black holes. Okay sure, but we also know (to my knowledge) that black holes "evaporate" over time. Could it be that the instant Bob gets sucked in, (an instant in his perceived time) the black hole dissipates (because it has evaporated over countless years, as perceived by an outside observer) leaving Bob completely unharmed?
Please clarify this. Thank you!

Well, the complete description of physics including black hole evaporation, is not completely understood, since it involves both gravity and quantum mechanics. However, qualitatively, we can say that there are two possible scenarios, depending on when Bob starts falling toward the black hole:
  1. Either the black hole evaporates before Bob gets to it.
  2. Bob gets to the black hole before it evaporates.
In case 2, things will look very different from Bob's point of view than from the point of view of a distant observer.

From Bob's point of view, his fall through the black hole and to his death at the singularity is so short that black hole evaporation is pretty much irrelevant.

From the point of view of a distant observer, Bob will meet his demise at the same "time" that the black hole evaporates completely. I use "time" in quotes, because this conclusion depends on the coordinate system used by the distant observer--the two events are not literally the same event.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top