Black Holes & Light: Theory or Fact?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between light and gravity in the context of black holes. It is clarified that while light does bend due to gravity, once it crosses the event horizon of a black hole, it cannot escape because the escape velocity exceeds the speed of light. This explains why black holes are not visible; they trap all light within them. Light from objects falling into a black hole can be observed before they reach the event horizon. The conversation emphasizes that light cannot be stationary and that the speed of gravity does not prevent light from being trapped by a black hole's intense gravitational field.
LEIN_AD
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was watching an interesting article on string theroy on TV the other night and they said (not sure if it was theroy or fact) that, the speed of light and gravity work at the same speed. eg gravity pulls light towards the source but the light is traveling fast enough to counter gravity, thus leading to the light being stationary.

This got me thinking if this statement is true how come we can't see black holes? Surly we would be able to see some light if both work at the same speeds.

Clarification on whether the statement is true or not would be of help aswell.
Thx heaps.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Consider an observer who hovers a small distance d above the event horizon of a black hole. The observer throws a ball straight up. If the initial speed of the ball (with respect to the observer) is less than the escape velocity due to gravity, then the ball comes back down. As the hovering distance d approaches zero, the escape velocity approaches the speed of light.
 
LEIN_AD said:
I was watching an interesting article on string theroy on TV the other night and they said (not sure if it was theroy or fact) that, the speed of light and gravity work at the same speed. eg gravity pulls light towards the source but the light is traveling fast enough to counter gravity, thus leading to the light being stationary.

This got me thinking if this statement is true how come we can't see black holes? Surly we would be able to see some light if both work at the same speeds.

Clarification on whether the statement is true or not would be of help aswell.
Thx heaps.
If you can lay your hand on Kip Thorne's "Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy", read his version of the "Parable of the ants". It is a fun way to answer the question you asked.
 
Wait I thought light does bend when it encounters gravity. Doesnt a black hole act as a lens bending the behind it.
 
LEIN_AD said:
eg gravity pulls light towards the source but the light is traveling fast enough to counter gravity, thus leading to the light being stationary.
Doesn't sound right. Light can't be stationary. Can you clarify?

This got me thinking if this statement is true how come we can't see black holes? Surly we would be able to see some light if both work at the same speeds.
The speed of gravity really isn't the issue. The black hole will have a gravitational field around it that light will fall into and either escape or be trapped by. Like George was saying, the closer you are to the black hole (or any mass really) the higher the "escape velocity" is for something to get away from that black hole. Once inside the event horizon of the black hole, the escape velocity is greater than the speed of light, so not even light (the fastest thing there is) can escape. If no light escapes it, you can't see it directly. Now, light eminating from stuff falling into the black hole prior to the event horizon can be seen.
 
EP said:
Wait I thought light does bend when it encounters gravity. Doesnt a black hole act as a lens bending the behind it.
Yes, but that's light that doesn't encounter the event horizon of the black hole. A light beam moving tangential to a black hole doesn't necessarily get drawn in, but does have its path deflected. A light beam going directly at a black hole is a goner.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top