Black holes, the sun and wormholes.

AI Thread Summary
Black holes are confirmed to exist through indirect evidence such as gravitational lensing and the behavior of nearby stars, despite the inability to observe them directly. The sun will not become a black hole as it lacks sufficient mass; only stars with at least five times the sun's mass can collapse into black holes. Wormholes are theoretical constructs that arise from Einstein's field equations, requiring exotic matter to function, but their existence remains unproven. The discussion highlights the distinction between established scientific theories and speculative concepts in astrophysics. Understanding these phenomena involves both theoretical frameworks and observational evidence.
Orl13
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I've been reading Kip Thorne's book "Black Holes and Time Warps" and was wondering about a couple of things. They're really basic questions that have been floating around in my head, but I can't ask any of my friends because none of them know anything about these topics, so...I came here. Please forgive me if these questions seem rudimentary to you educated folk.

Firstly, do black holes really exist or are they just part of a theory that is likely to be true? I've read a lot about black holes and their effects on space and time it's all very fascinating stuff, but I'm wondering if I'm reading about theories or actual existent gateways to oblivion.

Secondly, (this one may seem really stupid and I'm sorry) could our sun potentially become a black hole? I understand that black holes are fromed by a star collapsing on itself, is that the fate of ours? Is our sun considered a star?

Finally, wormholes, a tunnel through space and maybe even time. Do they exist? are they only theoretical? If they are existent then how in the world does one come to the conlucusion that they exist? Was there a physicist who was sitting around one day and thought to himself "man, wormholes would be cool" and developed a theory, or did a physicist stumble onto the exsitence or theoretical exsitence of wormholes.

Just a few questions that have been in the back of my head for awhile and I would appreciate them answered if it's not too much hassle
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
(Someone please correct me if i said something wrong..)
They do exist , The problem is that due to their nature, we can't have a direct evidence of there existence, you can't just point the telescope to a part of space look into one.
We can know they are out there buy looking at indirect evidence , such as gravitational lensing, and stars that appear to be in orbit round a point in space where there is no visible matter, or X-ray emmited from the accretion disk..
I guess there is other way to determine.

There is no fear that our sun could turn into a black hole , it doesn't have enough mass , Stars with mass about 5 and above the sun's mass are what you could expect to become a black hole.

I don't know much of the wormholes thing but I do know this , to use a wormhole you'd need exotic matter(matter that have negative or imaginary mass) to make the wormhole usable..
BTW : Wormholes and black holes are both solution to Einstein field equations, no one was thinking it would be cool , they are solution..
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top