Black Light Safety: Risks and Precautions

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Safety
AI Thread Summary
Black lights emit UV radiation, which poses a low risk, generally less than prolonged sun exposure, but can cause DNA damage over time. The brightness of UV sources cannot be determined visually, making it important to position them where direct viewing is avoided. While black lights can generate significant heat, using multiple bulbs in a single fixture may increase safety concerns. UV radiation is categorized into three types, with most black lights primarily emitting UVA, which is less harmful than UVB or UVC. Moderation in usage is advised to minimize potential risks.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,838
Reaction score
7,833
In another post, someone was asking about black lights..

Are they really emitting UV? Is it enough to be dangerous? In theory I mean. Obviously (scratch that, I mean: 'one would assume') they wouldn't market them if they were actually dangerous when used properly.

My son lights his room with them. Is he exposing himself to an excess of UV?

Also, do they put out more heat than normal bulbs? They seem to get very VERY hot. It occurs to me that using more than one in a fixture might be dangerous.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
…Are they really emitting UV? Is it enough to be dangerous? In theory I mean. Obviously (scratch that, I mean: 'one would assume') they wouldn't market them if they were actually dangerous when used properly.
They do emit UV. There is a low level of risk, probably less than sunlight at the beach that can cause skin cancer after years of exposure. Depends on how many and how bright the UV sources are. You’re not able to determine the brightness of the source by looking at it, as your eye does not respond to UV light. What distinguishes UV from visible light is that UV light is ionizing radiation and can cause DNA damage. I suggest the UV light source(s) be placed where they cannot be viewed directly, but only the objects being illuminated are visible. The light emanating (fluorescing) from the object is of lower energy than UV and not hazardous. Babies are sometimes exposed to UV radiation to help lower biliruben concentrations in their blood. Moderation is the guideline.
DaveC426913 said:
…Also, do they put out more heat than normal bulbs? They seem to get very VERY hot. It occurs to me that using more than one in a fixture might be dangerous.
UV radiation is more energetic than visible radiation and requires more energy to create it. Most means of generating visible light are inefficient, even the common incandescent lamp gets very hot because most of the emitted light is in the infrared, and only sensed as heat, not seen. The fixture should be labeled with it’s wattage rating and intended use.

For your info, UV radiation comes in three flavors and among many uses: UVA is used in sun tanning parlors. UVB is used to treat certain skin conditions such as Psoriasis. UVC (highly dangerous) is used for sterilization. Your son’s UV sources likely emit mostly in the UVA range.

 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top