Blackbody radiation frequency problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating properties of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) based on its blackbody characteristics at a temperature of 2.7 K. The maximum wavelength of the CMBR is determined to be approximately 1.0733 mm, with a corresponding frequency of about 0.280 THz. The intensity of the CMBR incident on Earth is calculated to be 3.013e-6 W/m^2. There is a clarification on how to interpret the total power incident on Earth, emphasizing that the intensity value represents what reaches each square meter at the top of the atmosphere. The conversation highlights the uniformity of the CMBR and its absorption characteristics in the atmosphere.
Benzoate
Messages
418
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Cosmic microwave background radiation fits the Planck equations for a blackbody at 2.7 K. a) What is the wavelength at the maximum intensity of the spectrum of the background radiation ? b) What is the frequency of the radiation at the maximum? c) what is the total power incident on Earth from the background radiation

Homework Equations



lambda(max)*T=2.898*10^-3 m*K
T=2.7 K
f=c/lambda(max)
sigma=5.6703e-8 W/m^2*K^4

R=sigma*T^4 or

The Attempt at a Solution



a) lambda(max)= 2.898*10^-3 m*K/(2.7 K)=1.0733*10^-3 m
b)f=c/lambda=(3e8 m/s)/(1.0733*10^-3 m)= 2.795 *10^11 /s
c)R =sigma*T^4= (5.6703e-8 W/m^2*K^4)((2.7 K)^4=3.013e-6
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Benzoate said:

The Attempt at a Solution



a) lambda(max)= 2.898*10^-3 m*K/(2.7 K) = 1.0733*10^-3 m

Hence, the relatively new field of "mm-wave astronomy"...

b)f=c/lambda=(3e8 m/s)/(1.0733*10^-3 m) = 2.795 *10^11 /s

I imagine they like to use "Hz" (Hertz), rather than sec^(-1), so this would be 0.280 THz.

c)R =sigma*T^4= (5.6703e-8 W/m^2*K^4)((2.7 K)^4) = 3.013e-6

So this gives the intensity of the "CMBR" in W/m^2. They're asking for the total power incident upon (the top of the atmosphere of) Earth, so you have one more step.
 
dynamicsolo said:
Hence, the relatively new field of "mm-wave astronomy"...



I imagine they like to use "Hz" (Hertz), rather than sec^(-1), so this would be 0.280 THz.



So this gives the intensity of the "CMBR" in W/m^2. They're asking for the total power incident upon (the top of the atmosphere of) Earth, so you have one more step.

So now I have to multiply the intensity of the "CMBR" times the area of the Earth in order to calculate the power incident upon the atmosphere of the earth? Nah, that can't be right since the total power incident upon the atmospher is only the atmosphere of the Earth ad ot the whole earth. Should I assume the area of the surface of the atmospher incident on is 1 square meter?
 
Benzoate said:
So now I have to multiply the intensity of the "CMBR" times the area of the Earth in order to calculate the power incident upon the atmosphere of the earth? Nah, that can't be right since the total power incident upon the atmospher is only the atmosphere of the Earth ad ot the whole earth. Should I assume the area of the surface of the atmospher incident on is 1 square meter?

The intensity you found is what is seen from everywhere on the sky, since the background radiation is (very nearly) uniform, so that value is what reaches each square meter of Earth. (We generally state that as "incident at the top of the atmosphere" since the microwave radiation largely is absorbed by the atmosphere in those wavelength bands and doesn't get to the Earth's surface.) I believe the question is asking for the total power over the entire Earth to stress the fact that this is really a small level. (However, radio telescopes are extremely sensitive and detectors responds to very tiny power levels.)
 
dynamicsolo said:
The intensity you found is what is seen from everywhere on the sky, since the background radiation is (very nearly) uniform, so that value is what reaches each square meter of Earth. (We generally state that as "incident at the top of the atmosphere" since the microwave radiation largely is absorbed by the atmosphere in those wavelength bands and doesn't get to the Earth's surface.) I believe the question is asking for the total power over the entire Earth to stress the fact that this is really a small level. (However, radio telescopes are extremely sensitive and detectors responds to very tiny power levels.)

Show I should multiply the intensity coming towards the atmosphere times the area of the Earth
 
Benzoate said:
Show I should multiply the intensity coming towards the atmosphere times the area of the Earth

I believe that is what is being asked for. Upon reading the question again, I can see how it could seem unclear, but I'm pretty sure that's the value they're looking for.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top