Blackhole radiation v Second Law

AI Thread Summary
Hawking radiation leads to black hole evaporation, raising questions about its compatibility with the second law of black hole dynamics, which states that the event horizon area cannot decrease. The discussion highlights that while the second law suggests a non-decreasing horizon area under the weak energy condition, Hawking's findings indicate that black holes can lose mass and area over time. Additionally, the size of the event horizon may vary depending on whether an observer is in free fall or static. The use of π for calculating spherical area in warped space is also questioned. Understanding these concepts may require knowledge of Killing Vectors and their implications in black hole thermodynamics.
ash99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can someone help me on this: Hawking Bernstein radiation can cause a BH to evaporate. The second law of BH dynamics says that the area of the event horizon cannot decrease. Isn't this a contradiction? Also when considering the size of the event horizon, is it different depending on wheather one is in free fall or static. Finally is it ok to use PI to calculate spherical area in heavily warped space?
If the answers involve Killing Vectors, I'll need help with those as well.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The Second Law

The horizon area is, assuming the weak energy condition, a non-decreasing function of time,

This "law" was superseded by Hawking's discovery that black holes radiate, which causes both the black hole's mass and the area of its horizon to decrease over time.

Above from:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_thermodynamics
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top