Blood Transfusion: Donor Antibody Response

  • Thread starter Thread starter brainyman89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blood
AI Thread Summary
During blood transfusions, donor antibodies typically do not attack the recipient's cells due to blood type compatibility. Individuals with blood group A do not produce antibodies against their own antigens, allowing for safe transfusions among the same blood group. Blood group O individuals can donate to anyone since they lack antigens, making their blood universally acceptable. However, concerns arise when considering that blood group O contains antibodies against A and B antigens. These antibodies would only be present if the individual had prior exposure to those antigens. In practice, transfusions utilize packed red blood cells, which are separated from the plasma that contains these antibodies, minimizing the risk of an immune response in the recipient. This careful matching and processing ensure that transfusions are safe and effective.
brainyman89
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
why don't the donor's antibodies(found in the transferred blood) attack the receiver's cells during blood transfusion?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
brainyman89 said:
why don't the donor's antibodies(found in the transferred blood) attack the receiver's cells during blood transfusion?

If you have blood group A, your body doesn't produce antibodies against your own antigens. So blood group A person can transfer blood to another blood group A person. If you have blood group 0, you have no antigens on your cell membrane, so receiver would not attack you, if you are the donor. So you can give blood to everyone if you are O. So blood transfusion is closely matched to make sure what you are saying would not occur. Cheers :smile:
 
sameeralord said:
If you have blood group A, your body doesn't produce antibodies against your own antigens. So blood group A person can transfer blood to another blood group A person. If you have blood group 0, you have no antigens on your cell membrane, so receiver would not attack you, if you are the donor. So you can give blood to everyone if you are O. So blood transfusion is closely matched to make sure what you are saying would not occur. Cheers :smile:

What i meant to ask is: suppose you are of blood group O, then your blood will contain antibodies ant-A and anti-B, if you transfer this blood to an individual (receiver) of blood group A for example, then would the antibodies anti-A in the donor's blood attack the receiver's RBC's of blood group A.
 
brainyman89 said:
What i meant to ask is: suppose you are of blood group O, then your blood will contain antibodies ant-A and anti-B, if you transfer this blood to an individual (receiver) of blood group A for example, then would the antibodies anti-A in the donor's blood attack the receiver's RBC's of blood group A.

Hey, that's a good question. Does a blood group 0 person develop antibodies for A and B, only if they are exposed to these antigens or it doesn't have to be that way? I'm not sure and also are only Red blood cells transferred in transfusions. Hopefully someone else who knows this can answer this.
 
brainyman89 said:
What i meant to ask is: suppose you are of blood group O, then your blood will contain antibodies ant-A and anti-B, if you transfer this blood to an individual (receiver) of blood group A for example, then would the antibodies anti-A in the donor's blood attack the receiver's RBC's of blood group A.

Like Sameer suggests, you'd only have those antibodies if you had prior exposures and even if you did your body wouldn't keep a constant circulating supply of them going (antigen specific antibodies are expensive to make, which is why our immune shuts down to "storage mode" after an immune response via memory cells).

We also use packed RBCs, which are red blood cells separated from whole blood. So the transfusion is really a nutrient solution containing the RBCs and none of the donor plasma (which is where the antibodies would be found).
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top