Blue light and an opaque object

  • Thread starter Thread starter daNAV1GATOR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
When blue light hits an opaque object with a resonant frequency lower than that of blue light, the light cannot be absorbed or transmitted. Instead, it is reflected by the electrons in the object. The discussion highlights confusion around the concepts of absorption, reflection, and the relationship between light frequency and material properties. The consensus leans towards the idea that the blue light will be reflected rather than absorbed or transmitted. Overall, the interaction depends on the material's properties and the frequency of the incoming light.
daNAV1GATOR
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I need help with a problem that was discussed here on PF also...

Snazzy, (or anybody! =) ] I need your thoughts again please!

QUESTION:
When blue light strikes an opaque object whose resonant frequency is lower than the frequency of blue light, what happens?
A- The amplitude of the vibrations of the electrons in the object become larger.
B- The object becomes warm
C- The blue light is absorbed without reemission
D- The blue light is reflected by the electrons in the object
E- The blue light is transmitted through the object

...This is a very tough one for me...

...'Security''s answer was B, The object becomes warm.

PF Admin Warren ('chroot') said, ""Becomes warm" means the same thing as "vibrates more rapidly." So this is not correct. If the light does not meet the material's "resonant frequency" (this is a bad way to describe this, by the way) then it will pass right through."
----He said "it will pass right through."

This guy on Yahoo! Answers said "Blue light should be reflected"
Another said "You see the blue light on it"


ARGH! I'M SO CONFUSED!



I am open to discuss this problem... if you don't want to give me your answer...
But it's pretty late here in the East Coast... so... well anyway, HELP! =)



 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the blue light is higher in frequency than the resonance frequency, and since the object is opague (presumably a metal), then the blue light will be reflected by the plasma electrons.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top