Board on top of two cylinders - inclined plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the mechanics of a board positioned on two cylinders on an inclined plane, analyzing the system using torque and force equations. The user derives the equation of motion for the board, concluding that the acceleration is given by ##\ddot{x_1} = \frac{12}{11}g\sin\theta##. The analysis involves friction forces between the board and cylinders, and the user expresses uncertainty about the sufficiency of their approach, which relies on one force equation and two torque equations. The response from another user confirms the correctness of the initial analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with torque and rotational dynamics
  • Knowledge of friction forces and their effects on motion
  • Basic principles of conservation of energy in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the application of Lagrangian mechanics to constrained systems
  • Study the effects of friction on rolling motion in detail
  • Learn about the dynamics of multi-body systems on inclined planes
  • Investigate energy conservation methods in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as engineers and researchers interested in dynamics and motion analysis of rigid bodies.

WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,850
Reaction score
553

Homework Statement


See image: http://s18.postimage.org/6ql2zlo2x/board_n_cylinders.png

The Attempt at a Solution


I know it says conservation of energy but I just wanted to do it in terms of torque and forces first. The reason I'm not sure about my answer is because I barely had to use more than 3 torque + force equations so it is disconcerting...

Anyways, I used a coordinate system with the x-axis along the incline and y-axis perpendicular to the incline as usual with positive being downwards and outwards. There is friction between the board and each of the two cylinders at their contact point opposing forward motion of the board, pointing along the x-axis of this coordinate system. Call ##f_2## the friction between the first cylinder and board and ##f_3## the friction between second cylinder and board. Note that in this coordinate system, the only acceleration is along the x - axis; call ##x_1,x_2,x_3## the x coordinates of the board, and two cylinders respectively. Hence the equation of motion for the board is ##m\ddot{x_1} = mg\sin\theta - f_2 - f_3## (note that the backwards pointing friction forces on the board from the two cylinders result in a 3rd law forward pointing friction force pair on each of the two cylinders).

Now for the two cylinders, their torque equations (with the respective reference points being from the contact points between the cylinders and the ground) are ##-(\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{2}R^{2} + \frac{m}{2}R^{2})\frac{\ddot{x_2}}{R} = -\frac{3}{4}m\ddot{x_2}R = -\frac{m}{2}gR\sin\theta - 2Rf_2## and similarly ##-\frac{3}{4}m\ddot{x_3}R = -\frac{m}{2}gR\sin\theta - 2Rf_3## (I added the negative signs in front of the ##I\alpha## terms because the cylinders are rolling forward along the incline hence they have negative angular acceleration). At this point, we note that ##\ddot{x_1} = 2\ddot{x_2} = 2\ddot{x_3}## in order to have no slipping between them. Thus adding together the two torque equations and applying this constraint we have that ##\frac{3}{4}m\ddot{x_1} = mg\sin\theta + 2f_2 + 2f_3##. Combining this with the equation of motion for the board gives ##\frac{11}{4}m\ddot{x_1} = 3mg\sin\theta## i.e. ##\ddot{x_1} = \frac{12}{11}g\sin\theta##.

I'm not entirely sure this is correct because as I said I only needed one force equation , 2 torque equations, and the constraint with no need for the force equations for the cylinder nor the vanishing torque equation for the board; I would like to think it is because of the highly constrained nature of the system as given in the problem but yeah idk. If it however is fine then I would like to show my attempt at the energy / lagrangian method here as well. Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks correct.

ehild
 
Looks correct
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
796
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K