Boat slowing down with variable acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a motor boat slowing down after the engine is shut off, with water resistance proportional to its speed. Participants suggest using differential equations to model the boat's speed over time, noting that the speed decays geometrically. The equation v = ce^(-kt) is proposed to describe this decay, where constants c and k are determined by the problem's parameters. Clarification is provided regarding a typographical error in the initial speed notation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between speed, time, and resistance in solving the problem.
ionitacodrut
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A motor boat of mass m moves on the surface of a lake at a speed0v. At the moment 0t= the engine is shut down. Assuming the resistance of water to be proportional to the speed of the boat, F=−rv, find
a) the time interval after which the boat stops;
b) the speed of the boat as a function of the distance covered with the shutdown engine.
I have tried using the kinetic variation law but can' exactly figure out the work done by F
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ionitacodrut said:
A motor boat of mass m moves on the surface of a lake at a speed0v.
There appears to be a typo in your post. The zero in "0v" is extraneous.

I would work on part a) first. Can you characterize the speed of the boat as a function of time?

If you know how to solve differential equations, there is a fairly simple one here. If not then you can notice that as the velocity of the boat is reduced the acceleration is reduced proportionally. So the fraction of the speed that bleeds off over a fixed time interval will be constant. That means that the speed must decay geometrically. So it can be modeled by a function like v = ce-kt for some constants c and k. You solve the equation by finding values of c and k that fit the givens of the problem (and that is essentially how you solve the differential equation).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top