Bogus email notification about threads with no new content.

  • Thread starter Thread starter strangerep
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Users are experiencing issues with receiving email notifications from Physics Forums about threads that have no new content. Notifications are sent even when the user has accessed the thread recently, leading to confusion. Possible explanations include posts being deleted shortly after they are made, either by users or moderators. This ongoing problem has been a source of annoyance for members, prompting calls for a fix. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in notification systems to improve user experience.
strangerep
Science Advisor
Messages
3,766
Reaction score
2,213
Here's an example. Look at the timestamp of my post #60 in this thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=663012&page=4

About an hour later, I got "update" email from PF notifying about this thread. But why? The timestamp on the email was about an hour after my most recent access of that thread. So why is PF emailing me? This sort of thing has been happening for ages, and it's a bit annoying.

Can this be fixed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
strangerep said:
Here's an example. Look at the timestamp of my post #60 in this thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=663012&page=4

About an hour later, I got "update" email from PF notifying about this thread. But why? The timestamp on the email was about an hour after my most recent access of that thread. So why is PF emailing me? This sort of thing has been happening for ages, and it's a bit annoying.

Can this be fixed?

It's possible someone replied and then immediately deleted their post.
 
Or one of the Mentors deleted the post because it was spam or otherwise problematical. This morning I deleted a spam post advertising video streams and banned the poster, about two minutes after he posted it. :devil:
 
It's possible someone replied and then immediately deleted their post.
Hmm,... like I sometimes do when I decide I've been too harsh...

Anyway, thanks for the replies guys.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top