Boiling liquid in a sealed container

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the boiling of a liquid in a sealed container filled with air and liquid at room temperature. Participants explore the implications of pressure changes on boiling points and the feasibility of using such a setup for a hobby heat engine project.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to calculate the temperature needed to boil a liquid in a sealed container, considering the pressure increase due to heating.
  • Another participant warns against heating pressurized vessels like acetone or ethyl bromide as a hobby.
  • Mr. A applies Gay-Lussac's Law to estimate pressure changes with temperature and uses the Antoine formula to predict vapor pressures for acetone, suggesting a boiling point around 60°C at a specific pressure.
  • A later reply challenges Mr. A's assumption that the space above the liquid remains air, explaining that the vapor pressure will increase and affect total pressure calculations.
  • Mr. A later reflects on the physics of a "two-phase thermosyphon," noting that such systems can operate at temperatures above the freezing point of the fluid, which alters the dynamics of the heat transfer process.
  • Discussion includes the concept of the "merit number" for working fluids, with mentions of water and acetone as potential candidates for near-room-temperature applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding pressure and vapor behavior in the sealed container, indicating a lack of consensus on the initial conditions and implications for boiling.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the behavior of gases and liquids under pressure, the applicability of the Antoine formula, and the specific characteristics of the two-phase thermosyphon system.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in thermodynamics, heat transfer systems, or hobbyist engineering projects may find the discussion relevant.

Larry Shick
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have a sealed container of fixed volume containing 3/4 air and 1/4 of some liquid by volume at room temperature (22C). I wish to boil the liquid by applying external heat.

As I apply heat to the container, the pressure inside the container will rise, which will change the boiling point of the liquid. How do I calculate the temperature needed to boil the liquid under these conditions?

If it matters, we can assume any boiling point in the range of Acetone (50C) to Ethyl Bromide (38C)

FWIW, I'm playing with the idea of building a heat engine based on low temperature differentials and operating at near room temperature. Since this would be a hobby thing, the working fluid needs to be affordable, available, not encumbered by heavy regulation, and not TOO nasty to work with.

Thanks In Advance.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The equation is given in the Wikipedia article on boiling point. Heating a pressurised vessel of either acetone or ethyl bromide is not something you want to do as a "hobby thing".
 
Mr. A:

Thanks for your quick response. Check me on this:

By Gay-Lussac's Law, and assuming the space above the liquid stays "air," the pressure (bar) goes up linearly with temperature (K), so 1.0 bar at 22 C or 295 K, and about 1.26 bar at 100 C or 373 K.

Vapor pressure of the liquid is predicted by the Antoine formula, so for Acetone about .27 bar at 22 C/295 K, 1.0 bar at 56 C/329 K (boiling point at normal atmosphere), and about 3.7 bar at 100 C/373 K.

The lines cross at about 60 C/333 K and 1.13 bar/16 PSI, which would be roughly the point I'm looking for, off by a bit because the "air" above the liquid isn't air any more.

Right? Thanks.
 
Larry Shick said:
Mr. A:

Thanks for your quick response. Check me on this:

By Gay-Lussac's Law, and assuming the space above the liquid stays "air," the pressure (bar) goes up linearly with temperature (K), so 1.0 bar at 22 C or 295 K, and about 1.26 bar at 100 C or 373 K.

Vapor pressure of the liquid is predicted by the Antoine formula, so for Acetone about .27 bar at 22 C/295 K, 1.0 bar at 56 C/329 K (boiling point at normal atmosphere), and about 3.7 bar at 100 C/373 K.

The lines cross at about 60 C/333 K and 1.13 bar/16 PSI, which would be roughly the point I'm looking for, off by a bit because the "air" above the liquid isn't air any more.

Right? Thanks.
No. Not right. The space above the liquid does not "stay air." The partial pressure of the vapor in the head space will increase and be equal to the equilibrium vapor pressure at the liquid temperature. So the total pressure in the head space will be equal to the air partial pressure plus the equilibrium vapor pressure of the volatile component. The total pressure will always be greater than the equilibrium vapor pressure so that, unless the liquid is heated very non-uniformly, the liquid will not boil.

Starting from your initial conditions, you can accurately calculate, for any given temperature of the vessel contents, (a) the amount of liquid (b) the amount of vapor in the head space (c) the partial pressure of the air (d) the total pressure. You can model this by treating the gases in the head space as an ideal gas, knowing the vapor pressure equilibrium relation, and assuming the density of the liquid is approximately constant.

Chet
 
Chet, thank you.

It's amazing what a little study will uncover. It appears that the physics of this thing are approximately those of a "two-phase thermosyphon" which is a wickless heat pipe. The big surprise for me is that such beasts do not need to operate at or near the boiling point of their working fluid if the tube is evacuated, and in fact can begin to function at just above the freezing/melting point of the fluid, which changes the whole dynamic.

There is a parameter called the "merit number" of the working fluid, which depends on the operating temperature of the device. For near-room-temperature heat pipes both water and acetone have their supporters. (The merit number was developed for use with heat pipes that use wicks, and one of its factors has to do with capillary transport, which seems to be irrelevant to the two-phase thermosyphon, which has no wick, so the merit number may be misleading for this application.)

Anyhow, I've put as much time into the subject as it warrants for now. My thanks to Mr. A and Chet for their responses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K