Boltzmann distribution and energy difference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy difference between the ground and excited states of calcium (Ca) using the absorption of 422.7-nm light. The energy difference is confirmed to be 282.15 kJ/mol, derived from the energy of the photon. Participants discuss using the Boltzmann distribution equation to find the ratio N*/N0 at different temperatures, but there are issues with unit consistency in calculations. It is emphasized that the Boltzmann constant should match the energy units used, either in J/mol or J. The conversation concludes with a clarification on unit conversions to resolve calculation errors.
schu9600
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The first excited state of Ca is reached by absorption of 422.7-nm light.
• Find the energy difference (kJ/mol) between ground and excited states.
• The degeneracies are g*/g0 = 3 for Ca. Find N*/N0 at 2 500 K.
• By what percentage will N*/N0 change with a 15-K rise in temperature?
• Find N*/N0 at 6 000 K.

Homework Equations



N2/N1 =(g2/g1 )^(-∆E/kT) (boltzmann distribution equation)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that g* is 2 and g. is 1
The Boltzmann constant is 1.381 x 10 -23 j/K
However I'm not sure how to get the energy from this information. If someone could help me out to get me started I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks.

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
After thinking about it a bit more would the energy difference just be the energy of a photon of light with the wavelength of 422.7 nm?

If someone could confirm this I'm pretty sure I could figure the rest out.
 
Yes, that is correct (remember to multiply by Avogadro's constant to get the energy per mole of photons, however).
 
Okay so I've figured out the energy to be 282.15 kj/mol

For the rest of the parts I seem to get 0 for all of them. This doesn't seem right to me. Any advice?

I've been doing N2/N1 = 3^-(282150J)/[(1.381x10^-23J/K)(2500K)]
Using this I get an answer of 0
I get the same answer with a temperature of 2515K and 6000K.
 
Your units need to match. If you are expressing your units of energy in J/mol then you need to use a Boltzmann constant with units of J/mol K (8.314 J/mol K). Alternatively, you could express your ΔE in terms of J and use the 1.381x10^-23 J/K value for the Boltzmann constant.
 
Thanks that cleared up that question. :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top